نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
In description of mural in Islamic art references, It,s
seen that the expression of «mural painting» despite
of art encyclopedia, only in putted to specific technic,
and so, specially in Islamic art era it was judged in
no advancement .On the other hand, some people
believed in special grow & advancement for it , it is
named by some titles as «architectural ornaments » ,
« abstractive designs» and so on.
It,s important that in some texts, these two perceptionsare used for reject & concessive of this art, at the same time, in summarily
.for example said:»… mural in Islamic era didn,t advance and gradually was
replaced by stucco decorations .and epigraphic script «.(Ashenaei ba makatebe
nagashi,9.2002)
If we accept, that stucco decorations & epigraphic script are used in ornaments;
themselves are mural ; So , what above attitude is justified? And if we disagreed
with it ; so ,what definition will have to mural ?
In this essay , we have been tried out by documentation to concept, of mural,
according to lexical definitions of famous mural as Siqueiros & others , criticize the
attitude to this issue .Therefore, It,s cleared that whatever in Islamic art reference &
as architectural ornaments , stucco decorations & etc , it self is clear confirmation
,of Islamic mural ; which in aspect of esthetic values and visual art and art , not
only was advanced , but also could make the ornaments that is name as world
culture heritages , now.
کلیدواژهها English