Research on the Main Origin of the Caskets of Shaykh Safi and Shah Ismail Safavi

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PH. D, Assistance Professor, Tabriz Islamic Art University Faculty Member of Tabriz Islamic art University Head of Multimedia Faculty

2 teacher in art group

Abstract

 
The caskets of Shaykh Safi al-Din Ardabili and Shah Ismail safavi are considered as the wooden and exquisite works of Islamic art. Current location of these two caskets is the tomb of Shaykh Safi al-Din Ardabili in the city of Ardabil. Shaykh’s casket belongs to the Timurid period while Shah Ismail safavi’s casket belongs to the Safavid period. These two caskets have been built with different techniques such as carving, inlay, mosaic and wood drainage, and decorated with types of Iranian noble designs. The construction of these two caskets has been attributed in many Western and sometimes Iranian sources to the reign of Homayon Shah, the Indian emperor, and Indian artists. However, according to studies and researches, there are many reasons for the originality and Iranian origin of these two caskets; among which are the differences between the ornaments, the types of decorations and consuming materials and the different methods of inlaying in tombs in India and Iran, the structural similarity of the two caskets with works of the Islamic period in Iran as well as presenting the name of the Iranian artist and founder in the inscriptions of these two wooden caskets and other historical reasons that have been analyzed in a detailed manner in the research process. This important detail is explained by the above-mentioned reasons in order to disambiguate the origin of the two works of the Islamic period in Iran.
The necessity of this article is due to the fact that no research has been done in connection with the Iranian origin of these two caskets and only decorations are checked in articles that are linked with these two caskets. The purpose of the present research is to criticize the hypothesis of presentation of these two caskets as gifts by Homayoun Shah to the Safavid Shah Tahmasb I and to prove the Iranian origin of these two great works of art in the Timurid and Safavid era territory in Iran. The research aims at answering the following main questions:
Are two caskets presented by Homayoun Shah to Shah Tahmasb I and made by Indian artists?
What reasons would confirm the Iranian origin of the Shaykh Safi’s and Shah Ismail’s caskets?
Research method in this essay is descriptive and analytical and the approach of this research is Comparative. Also data has been gathered via field study and library research. This article contains important and significant results. The presentation of wooden boxes by Homayoun Shah to Shah Tahmasb was referred to in none of the studied historical sources. In addition, these two caskets belong to two different historical periods; a fact that dismisses the possibility of their concurrence and presentation of both by Homayoun Shah to Shah Tahmasb. Also, decorative patterns and executive techniques in the aforementioned caskets have followed the sources of the Timurid and Safavid periods in Iran. Decorative patterns and executive techniques specify that these two caskets were made by Iranian artists who were familiar with original and Iranian art sources. In other words, Indian artists could not be exactly well-informed of the artistic and original Iranian sources. These two caskets in terms of shape and form are like other caskets built in Iran. In other words, their form is cubic. Another important result is the existence of similarity between tomb decoration and decoration of these two caskets. The carvings of both caskets are similar to the carvings of the Timurid and Safavid periods. Also the most common motifs of the Timurid and Safavid periods were used. Eventually based on historical studies and comparisons and analysis, it can be said that these two caskets were not Homayoun Shah's gifts to Shah Tahmasb safavi, therefore these two wooden caskets have Iranian origin and were made by Iranian artists and in accordance with the Iranian art style.

Keywords


The Holy Quran
  Amraei, Mehdi. 2013. Art carving. Tehran: samt.
  Ardabili, Ibn Bazzaz.1998 .Safwaft al-Safa . Translation from Gholam Reza Tabatabaee . Tehran: Zaryab.
 Azhand. Jacob . 2010. Khataei  in Book Design in Iran. Negareh journal. Number 10. 17-29.
 Brand,R.Hillen.1998. Safavid Art And Architecture,London,British Museum.
Dadvar. Abul Qasem and Dalaei. Azade. 2016. Theoretical Foundations of Iranian Traditional Arts in the Islamic Period. Tehran: Markabe sepid.
Dibaj. Esmail. 1965. Ardabil Historical Guide. Tabriz: bina.
Farzaneh. Ghaeeni. 2010 . Knowledging the Safavid dynasty coins. Tehran:Pazineh.
Gafarifard. Zahra and partners. Shiite slogans on the Seljuk period wooden works until the beginning of the Timurid period. Shiite Knowledge journal. Number 52. 35-52.
Henri Stierlin,2010. Islamic Art  And Architecture From Isfahan To The Taj Mahal, New York.
Karimiyan.Masoomeh.2013. Creating the Qur'anic place based on the Timurid carvings. Master; Iran,Tabriz, Tabriz Islamic Art University.
Kheirollahi,mozhgan. 2009.wooden tomb chests of sheikh safi-al-din ardabilis mausoleum: the study of their design, technique and contents.Master; Iran,Tabriz, Tabriz Islamic Art University.
Kianmehr, Ghobad and Partners 2005. The influence of Safavid ideology on woodcarving On the rule of Shah Tahmasb. Journal of The Faculty of Letters and Humanities University of Esfahan Number 40. 203-234.
koorkiyan.am.1919. Fantasy gardens. . Translation from Parviz Marzban.Tehran:farzan.
Motavalli.Abdullah.2013. Symbols of religious propaganda in the Safavid government. Religions and mysticism Journal. Number 40. 171-202.
- Noshahi. Aref and Sahafbashi. Esmail. 1997. Indian tombs. Philosophy and theology Journal. Number37.68-84.
Parsadoust. Manouchehr. 2003. Shah Tahmasb. Tehran: enteshar.
Pop.Arthur and Ackerman. Phyllis. 1909. Search in Iranian art. Tehran: Scientific and cultural publications.
Ray. Soukmar. 2005. Homayoun in Iran. Translation from Forouzande shahraki. Tehran: Aroon.
Rouzitalab. Gholam Reza and Jalali Nahid. 2007. Inlay art. Tehran: samt.
Safari.baba. 1991. Ardebil on the history track. Volume 1 & 2.tehra: Azad University of Ardebil
Sanati Irani, haleh. 2013. Disigning and fabrication Wooden lightings, in interior spaces of Ardabil sheikhsafi shrine, on the basis of its wooden works. Master; Iran,Tabriz, Tabriz Islamic Art University.
Shardin. Jean.1997. Shardin's Travelogue. Translation from Mohammad Abbasi. Tehran: Amirkabir.
viyur.MA.1978. Preliminary review of the conservation issues of the five historic buildings of Iran.
Yousefi, Hassan and golmaghanizadeh asl, malake.2006. Archeology and History of the Art of the Sheikh Safi al-Din Ardebili. Ardabil:Nikamooz.
Raeiszadeh. Sara. 2012. Symbolic Values in Geometric Patterns of Sheikh Safi Collection. Naghshmayeh journal. Number9. 73-84.
Sheil,Lady(Mary).1978. Glimpses of Life And Manners In Persia,Second Edition Arno Press,NewYork.
Translation from Keramatollahe Afsar. Tehran: Antiquities Organization.
Yousefi, Hassan and golmaghanizadeh asl, malake. 2010.shiah arts in history and cultural ensemble of shaikh safi al-din in ardabil. Ardabil:yavariyan.
ziba. Ezadparast. 2007. Lotus Plant to Arabesque and khataei. Rahpouye honar journal. Number1.58-61