A Critical Analysis of Qajar Popular Culture, and Theo-political Discourse as Reflected in the Narrative Tile Paintings of Mo’aven-ol-Molk Tekyeh

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student, Faculty of Art Research, Department of Art, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Art, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Religion has had a significant impact on the Qajar cultural sphere, influencing social structure, cultural discourse, and ideological policies. The primary outcome of this theoretical-political framework is to validate the culture of everyday life, to establish the notion of bio-social, cultural representation, and daily activities, and to structure cognitive processes and cultural conduct. This research examines the theological nature of the tile paintings of Mo’aven-ol-Molk Tekyeh and their emphasis on the teachings of Shiism, particularly the principle of Velayat al-Faqih. The focus is on Shiite narrative tile paintings as a form of discourse, specifically within the context of theo-politics. Cultural policy is a combination of actions, values, norms and principles that are adopted in a thoughtful way to guide and monitor cultural actions in a specific society by the agents of the society. Scholars, as religious agents, promoted a kind of religious cultural policy in the popular culture in order to set an example. The goal of the cultural policy of scholars for the Qajar bio-culture was to set a cultural pattern. One of the dimensions of these cultural policies is the religious policies of the popular culture which represents a religiously oriented form of popular culture policy. The critical analysis of religious politics for the Qajar folk culture and its effect on the tile painting of Mo’aven-ol-Molk Tekyeh is the most important issue of this research. This analysis deals with a discourse situation. This is termed a discourse because both the religious politics of popular culture and the tile representations of popular culture, in terms of their nature and social mechanisms, acquire social orientation and form. To fully understand the relationship between religious discourse and popular culture in Iran during the Qajar era, it is important to examine the impact of planned interventions on the organized guidance of this religious discourse.
Purposes & Questions: The aim of this research is an examination of the relationship between theo-politics and popular culture in the tile paintings of Mo’aven-ol-Molk Tekyeh, with an emphasis on comprehending the language of theo-politics and the role of popular culture in these artworks. The research questions are: 1. How does the theo-political character reflect the Qajar popular culture in the tile paintings of Mo’aven-ol-Molk Tekyeh? 2. What are the primary discursive politics in the narrative tile paintings of Mo’aven-ol-Molk Tekyeh within the theo-political framework of Qajar popular culture?
Methods: The descriptive-analytical method relies on the rigorous examination and interpretation of data through critical content analysis. The instruments used for data collection include note-taking, observation, and a new search tools. The study sample comprises 25 tile paintings with religious motifs that are associated with Mo’aven-ol-Molk Tekyeh. These paintings were deliberately selected to effectively address the research questions. The data analysis technique relies on critical discourse analysis and is grounded in Fairclough's three-dimensional perspectives.
Findings & Results: This study necessitated the development of sociolinguistic interpretive tools grounded in Fairclough's theory. Additionally, it benefited from Fairclough's theoretical framework and practical instructions, which enabled the identification of the inherent inconsistencies within the text. The study’s findings indicate that the popular culture embodies religious policies that may be seen from two different angles. Initially, he replicated the cultural practice of reproducing religious actions on the tiles, along with the strategy responsible for overseeing this practice. This historical phenomenon remains evident in the opinions of scholars depicted in the tile paintings of Mo’aven-ol-Molk Tekyeh. The theo-policies of the Constitutional period have been replicated as a means of expressing identity and cultural opposition. This process manifests as a form of visual cultural discourse. The cultural discourses represented in the Mo’aven-ol-Molk Tekyeh serve as a prominent form of popular media. The religious tile paintings of Mo’aven-ol-Molk Tekyeh possess a distinctly social dimension, operating as vehicles of visual cultural discourse. This encompasses totalism, with a focus on the authority of intellectuals as religious agents, jurisprudential fundamentalism, and theological orientation. This cultural discourse is rooted in the prevalent social and legal policies that focus on the dissemination of religious teachings and speeches among the Iranian populace. It is also characterized by a strong emphasis on constructing religious identity – particularly within the Shiʿi cultural framework – through practices such as mourning and commemoration of the Imams, and by acknowledging the influential role of religious scholars in shaping popular culture. Additionally, this discourse is associated with cultural resistance. Opponents of Western discourse identified a social niche in which Western-influenced traits were being reproduced and integrated into the structured framework of society. This trend is marked by an increasing emphasis on religious themes within popular culture, alongside the depiction of prominent activists who highlighted the intellectuals of the Constitutional period in politically charged tile paintings.

Keywords


Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (V.W. McGee. & M. Holquist, Eds.). University of Texas Press. https://ia600409.us.archive.org/2/items/SpeechGenresAndOtherLateEssays/Speech%20Genres%20and%20Other%20Late%20Essays.pdf
(2008). Aesthetics of Verbal Creation. Buenos Aires: Twenty-first century.
Bazargan, A. (1996). Hussein, the heir and follower of the prophets' path: Presenting the uprising of Hussein to the Quran [Conference Paper]. Collection of articles from the Second International Congress on Imam Khomeini (s) and the Culture of Ashura, (Vol. 2, p. 135). http://www.imam-khomeini.ir/fa/‌Bazargan [In Persian].
Bhaskar, R. (1987). Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. Verso. https://www.amazon.de/-/en/Scientific-Realism-Human-Emancipation-Bhaskar/dp/0860911438
Chouliaraki, L. & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in the Late Modernity. University Press. https://books.google.de/books/about/Discourse_in_Late_Modernity.html?id=u3mQfYAyrbYC&redir_esc=y
Cornejo, R., Albornoz, N., & Palacios, D. (2016). Subjetividad, realidad y discurso: Entre el determinismo estructuralista y el construccionismo social. Cinta de Moebio Revista de Epistemología de Ciencias Sociales, (56). 121– 135. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-554X2016000200001
E'zam Qodsi, H. (2000). Memoirs of My Life or the 100-Year History of Iran. Karang. https://tinyurl.com/23um66a9 [In Persian].
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/abs/1989
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/abs/norman1992
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/1995Fairclough
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge. https://howardaudio.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/n-fairclough-analysing-discourse.pdf
Fairclough, N. (2005). Peripheral vision: discourse analysis in organization studies: the case for critical realism. Organization Studies, 26(6), 915 – 938. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054610
Fairclough, N. (2014). Critical Language Awareness. Routledge. https://books.google.de/books?id=lHDXAwAAQBAJ&hl=de&source=gbs_book_other_versions
Fairclough, N. (2018). CDA as dialectical reasoning. In J. Flowerdew & J. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 18– 38). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Handbook-of-Critical-Discourse-Studies/Flowerdew2018f
Fairclough, N. Jessop, B. & Sayer, A. (2007). Critical realism and semiosis. . 5, 1. 2 – 10.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.; C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). Harvester Press. https://monoskop.org/images/5/5d/Foucault_Michel_Power_Knowledge_Selected_Interviews_and_Other_Writings_1972-1977.pdf
Goodarzi (Dibaj), M. (2005). Tarikh-e Naghashi-ye Iran [History of Iranian painting]. Organization for Research and Composing University Textbooks in Islamic and Human Sciences (SAMT). https://samt.ac.ir/fa/book/1402/PaintingGoodarzi [In Persian].
Jamalzadeh, N. (2004). The discursive diversity of Shiite scholars in the Constitutional era (Part Two). Din va Ertebataat8(4), 177-202. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/60502/Jamalzadeh1383 [In Persian].
Mahan, J. (2006). Exploring the research agenda for theology, religion and popular culture: report of a panel discussion at the American Academy of Religion. Journal of Religion and Popular Culture, 12(1), p. 6.
Forbes, B. (2017). Introduction: Finding Religion in Unexpected Places. In B. Forbes & J. Mahan (Ed.), Religion and Popular Culture in America (3rd ed.) (pp. 1-24). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780520965225-002
Forbes, B. D., & Mahan, J. H. (Eds.). (2017). Religion and popular culture in America (3rd ed.). University of California Press. https://www.ucpress.edu/books/religion-and-popular-culture-in-america-third-edition/paper
Marx, K. (2008). El Capital. Crítica de la economía política. Libro I, Tomo I. Akal. https://biblioteca.ciesas.edu.mx/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Marx_El-capital_Tomo-1_Vol-1.pdf
Mehdiabadi, M., & Khadivi, S. (2002). Changes in the architecture and decorations of Takieh Mo'aven al-Molk, Kermanshah.  Athar23(33-34), 100-145. https://journal.richt.ir/athar/article-1-212-fa.html [In Persian].
Naini, M. H. (1948). Tanbih al-Ummah va Tanzih al-Milla (S. M. Taleqani, Ed.). Sherkat-e Sahami-e Enteshar. https://fa.wikinoor.ir/wiki/Naeeni [In Persian].
Nejati Hosseini, S. M. (2008). Religious politics and popular culture in Iran: A critical discourse analysis of development plans (1988-2008). Religion & Communication14(32), 47-77. https://doi.org/10.30497/rc.2008.1380 [In Persian].
Panjehbashi, E., & Farhad, F. (2015). To study the designs having religious theme on the tiles of Mo’aven-ol- Molk Tekyeh. Negarineh Islamic Art2(7.8), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.22077/nia.2017.742.1021 [In Persian].
Qara’ati, H. (2015). The role of religious places in the social and political discourses of Qajar Era, case study of Tehran. History of Islam15(60), 171-198. https://hiq.bou.ac.ir/article_14416.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Sepehr, M. M. (1998). Nasekh al-Tavarikh (J. Kianfar, Ed.). Asatir. ttps://fa.wikinoor.ir/wiki/Nasekh [In Persian].
Shahbazi, S., & Shahbazi, S. (2002). Takyeh Mo'aven al-Molk, a manifestation of religious and epic art and historical figures of Iran. Ketab-e Mahe Honar, (103 & 104), 46-51. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/90357/Tekyeh1381 [In Persian].
Sharif Razi, M. (1953). Asar al-Hujjah. Borqei Bookstore.  https://https://fa.wikinoor.ir/wiki/Asaralhojaj [In Persian].
Shayestehfar, M. (2011). The reflection of motifs from the Surah of Yusuf in the murals of Abbasieh Tekyeh, Kermanshah. Ketab-e Mahe Honar, (159), 54-63. http://noo.rs/m0c9U [In Persian].
Shirazi, M., & Mousavilar, A. (2017). Retrieval of identity layers in Qajar Era (case study: ceramics). Negareh Journal12(41), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.22070/negareh.2017.483 [In Persian].
Soltani Abri, M. S. , Zaahed, F. and Saqafi nejad, S. M. (2022). Rereading clergy’s stances on the power transition from the Qajars to the Pahlavi dynasty. Tārīkh-i Īrān15(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.52547/irhj.15.1.1 [In Persian].
Storey, J. (2009). Inventing popular culture: From Folklore to Globalization. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.de/books/about/Inventing_Popular_Culture.html?id=AvwyS1VJukQC&redir_esc=y
Storey, J. (2010). Culture and Power in Cultural Studies: the Politics of Signification. Edinburgh University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctv2f4vh0z
Storey, J. (2015). Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: an Introduction (7th ed.). Pearson Education. https://search.worldcat.org/title/Cultural-theory-and-popular-culture-:-an-introduction/oclc/963686695
Sultan al-Wa'izin Shirazi, M. (1969). Sad Maqale-ye Soltani (Rahnamay-e Yahud va Nasara va Moslemin dar Marefat-e Tourat va Injil va Quran-e Majid) [One hundred royal articles (A guide for Jews, Christians, and Muslims in understanding the Torah, Gospel, and Holy Quran)]. Ketabforoushi-ye Eslamiyeh. https://fa.wikinoor.ir/wiki/Soltan1348 [In Persian].
Sultan al-Wa'izin Shirazi, M. (2015). Shabha-ye Pishavar [The nights of Peshawar]. Parr Publications. http://www.parnashr.ir/Pishavar1394 [In Persian].
Vámbéry, Á. (2008). Siahat-e Darvishi Dorughin dar Khanat-e Asiya-ye Miyaneh [Travels of a fake dervish in the Khanates of Central Asia] (F. Khajenoorian, Trans.). Elmi va Farhangi Publications. https://fa.wikinoor.ir/wiki/vambery1 [In Persian].
Williams, R. (1998). The Analysis of culture. In J. Storey (Ed.), Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: a Reader (2th ed.) (pp. 48-56). The University of Goergia Press. https://www.amherst.edu/media/view/88660/original/Williams+-+The+Analysis+of+Culture.pdf
Zemelman Merino, H. (2010). Sujeto y subjetividad: la problemática de las alternativas como construcción posible. Polis, Revista Latinoamericana, 9(27), 355-366. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-65682010000300016
Zemelman, H. (2005). Voluntad de Conocer. El Sujeto y su Pensamiento en el Paradigma crítico. Anthropos Editorial. https://archive.org/details/zemelman-r.-voluntad-de-conocer.-el-sujeto-y-su-pensamiento-en-el-paradigma-critico/page/n1/mode/2up
Exploring the Research Agenda for Theology, Religion and Popular Culture: Report of a Panel Discussion at the American Academy of Religion, November 2005. (2006). Journal of Religion and Popular Culture, 12(1): 1–4. https://online.ucpress.edu/jrpc/article-abstract/12/1/1/204205/Exploring-the-Research-Agenda-for-Theology?redirectedFrom=fulltext