Components of Eternity in Traditional Art: An Analysis of Ananda K. Coomaraswamy's Opinions and Ideas

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Iran University of Art, Theoretical Science Faculty and Higher Art Studies, Tehran, Iran.

2 M.A. Student in Art Studies, Iran University of Art, Theoretical Science Faculty and Higher Art Studies, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Since long ago, man has longed for eternal life and cultivated the dream of being immortal in his mind and conscience. The origin of this concern is in the love that man feels for immortality in the depths of his soul. Belief in immortality plays a decisive and important role in man’s perception of life and its meaning. The observation of the eternal visual order and stable symbolic manifestations is an objective sign of the stability of human determination and will in showing the infinite nature and eternal space, in humanity’s transitory encounter with the mortal and unstable material world. In the traditional worldview, art is a path for human perfection and the artist’s creativity as participation in divine creativity. Symbols are reflections of stability and durability in a world of change, because ideas are eternal essences and are free from changes and transformations. Traditional art is associated with knowledge and reflects manifestations of the realm of God and higher worlds beyond the material world. Coomaraswamy, a sage and a scholar of the Perennial Philosophy, explained and interpreted in his works the eternal dimension of traditional artworks and their symbolic meanings in accordance with this philosophy. He considers the heavenly fundamentals of existence to be the field of all dynamic and living patterns and examples in the process of creating a work of art. In other words, in his vision, works of art according to perennial philosophy cannot be divided into two categories, functional and spiritual, but belong to both functional and semantic, natural and metaphysical worlds. He considers symbols to be the universal language of art, an international language, which differs only in tones and accents. He considers the condition for understanding the true meaning of symbols, which are not just verbal constructions, to study the extensive written works of nations that contain the description of symbols, and to learn the basis of symbolic thought. Therefore, the importance and necessity of this research lies in enumerating, analyzing, explaining, clarifying, and regulating the components of eternity.
Purposes & Questions: This study seeks to analyze critical perspectives and to infer and elucidate the components of eternity in traditional art as articulated by him. The main question that this research seeks to answer is as follows: What are the eternal components in traditional art from Coomaraswamy’s point of view?
Methods: The research method is descriptive-analytical, and the method of collecting information and data has been done through documentary and library-based methods. Research in conventional academic categories is qualitative in terms of nature, fundamental and theoretical in terms of purpose, and descriptive and analytical in terms of tools. In the analysis, an effort has been made not to deviate from the foundations of perennial philosophy. It should further be noted that the research method involves engaging critically with relevant opinions and theories, avoiding the imposition of prejudice, extracting concepts of eternity from Coomaraswamy’s works, and systematically organizing them in accordance with the principles of perennial philosophy. The study and review of historical works based on the university research method clearly showed the gap and lack of extraction of the elements and components of eternity for traditional works of art. Therefore, the differences of this research compared to the background cases are the extraction, analysis, and explanation of the mentioned components in the art tradition from the mentioned point of view, and the discussion regarding the relationship of these indicators with the analysis of eternal symbolic features in the artworks.
Findings & Results: According to the opinions and views mentioned, traditional art has eternal and timeless indicators and components arising from universal semantic and epistemological principles and foundations in connection with its symbolic nature. These components include: The hierarchical and existential priority of intellectual knowledge (intuitive intellect in its Platonic sense) over sensory knowledge in the path of perfection, obtaining meanings from the unseen world and its image in imagination, Creativity in divine creativity by adapting to divine attributes, the representation of the eternal and continuous state of the heavenly world (more expression of the representation of the relation of objects with God or their source), applying the principle of unity in plurality, plurality in unity, Negation of individual and sensual expression and reference to the absolute and true self and the preference of the divine ego over the carnal ego and individuality of the artist, and Manifestation of absolute divine beauty in all beauties.

Keywords


اعوانی، غ. (‌1375). حکمت و هنر معنوی: مجموعه مقالات. گروس. https://elmnet.ir/doc/31050921-24821
افشار مهاجر، ک. (‌1394) بهره‌های اخلاقی از هنرهای سنتی. در م. آزاده فر (ویراستار علمی)، هنر و اخلاق: ‌مجموعه مقالات. انتشارات سوره مهر. http://soorehmehr.ir/book/2376
اولدمیدو، ه. (۱۳۸۹). سنت‌گرایی: دین در پرتو فلسفه جاویدان (ر. کورنگ بهشتی). حکمت. (نسخه اصلی منتشر شده در ۲۰۰۰). https://elmnet.ir/doc/30825540-50261
بورکهارت، ت. (‌1386). مبانی هنر اسلامی (الف. نصری، مترجم). حقیقت. https://alaeeketab.com/product/1386
بورکهارت، ت. (‌1390). مبانی هنر مسیحی (الف. نصری، مترجم). حکمت. https://www.hekmat-ins.com/product/1390
 بویلستون، ن. (1387) آناندا کوماراسوامی و تفسیر نمادها (م. صفی‌پور، مترجم). پژوهشنامۀ فرهنگستان هنر، ۲(۳)، 81-92. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/540233
پاکباز­، ر. (139۶)­. دایر­ه­المعارف هنر­. فرهنگ معاصر­. https://ajansbook.ir
پیروزام، ش.، و بینای مطلق، س. (1392). بررسی مسأله خلاقیت در هنر سنتی. جاویدان خرد، ۱۰(۲)، 29-46. https://www.javidankherad.ir/article_32903.html
حنش، الف. م. (1401). نظریۀ هنر اسلامی: مفهوم زیباییشناسی و ساختار معرفتی (ص. فدوی، مترجم). نگاه معاصر. https://alefbalib.com/MetaData/793680 (نسخه اصلی منتشر شده در ۲۰۱۷)
خاتمی، م. (1393). پیش درآمد فلسفهای برای هنر ایرانی. فرهنگستان هنر جمهوری اسلامی ایران، مؤسسۀ تألیف، ترجمه و نشر آثار هنری (متن). https://matnpub.ir/product/1393
داداشی، الف. (1383). نگاه دینی به برخی ویژگی‌های هنرسنتی و هنر عامیانه. فرهنگ مردم ایران، ۳-۴، 40-47.  https://www.noormags.ir/view/ar/1017357
ذکرگو، الف. (1378). تأملی در آرای کوماراسوامی. نامۀ فرهنگستان علوم، ۱۴-۱۵، 61-76. https://www.noormags.ir/view/ar/articlepage/748580
ریخته‌گران، م. (1397) هنر، زیبایی، تفکر: تأملی در مبانی نظری هنر. نشرساقی. https://yassavoli.com/product/4799408
زواریان، ز. (1396). من بهشت را دیدهام. تأملاتی در فلسفه هنرهای غربی، شرقی و اسلامی: گفتوگو با امیرحسین ذکرگو. نقد فرهنگ. https://www.naqdefarhang.com/product/1396
شاد قزوینی، پ.، و ادراکی، م. (139۹). تحلیلی بر نقش شمسه از منظر اندیشه و عرفان ابن‌عربی. هنرهای صناعی اسلامی، ۴(۱)، ۱-۱۱.  https://jih-tabriziau.ir/article-1-84-fa.html
شوان، ف. (1377). زیباشناسی و رمزپردازی در هنر و طبیعت (م. آزاد، مترجم). نقد و نظر، ۴(۱۵-۱۶)، 127-136. https://jpt.isca.ac.ir/article_21939.html
صفوی، س. (1397). ارکان فلسفه هنر اسلامی. آکادمی مطالعات ایرانی لندن. https://iranianstudies.org/fa/1397/09/13
عزیزی، ع. (عکاس). (۱۳۹۶). تصاویری از گنبد مسجد شیخ لطف الله اصفهان و طراحی طاووسی داخل گنبد. آثار هنرمندان ایران. بازیابی در ۱۰ تیر، ۱۴۰۲، از http://www.azizihonar.com/index.php?newsid=6391#prettyPhoto
فغفوری، م. (1387). سنت‌گرایان، زیبایی و سلسله مراتب هنر. پژوهشنامه فرهنگستان هنر، ۲(۳)، 56-71. https://elmnet.ir/doc/1097738-79115
کمالی دولت‌آبادی، ر. (1396). بازخوانی عرفانی مبانی هنرهای تجسمی. انتشارات سوره مهر. https://sooremehr.ir/book/2847
کوئین، و. (1395). یگانه سنت (ر. قاسمیان، مترجم). حکمت.  https://www.hekmat-ins.com/product/1395
کوماراسوامی، آ. (‌1382). مقدمه‌ای بر هنر هند (الف. ذکرگو، مترجم). نشر روزنه. https://yassavoli.com/product/4799385
کوماراسوامی، آ. (‌1389). هنر و نمادگرایی سنتی (ص. طباطبایی). فرهنگستان هنر جمهوری اسلامی ایران، مؤسسۀ تألیف، ترجمه و نشر آثار هنری (متن). https://matnpub.ir/product/2/1393
 کوماراسوامی، آ. (1390). مبانی سنتی هنر و زندگی: تأملی در کتاب رقص شیوای آناندا کوماراسوامی (الف. ذکرگو، مترجم). فرهنگستان هنر جمهوری اسلامی ایران، مؤسسۀ تألیف، ترجمه و نشر آثار هنری (متن). https://matnpub.ir/product/1390
کوماراسوامی، آ. (‌1391) استحالۀ طبیعت در هنر (ص. طباطبایی، مترجم). فرهنگستان هنر جمهوری اسلامی ایران، مؤسسۀ تألیف، ترجمه و نشر آثار هنری (متن). https://matnpub.ir/product/1391
کوماراسوامی، آ. (‌1393). فلسفۀ هنر مسیحی و شرقی (الف. ذکرگو، مترجم). فرهنگستان هنر جمهوری اسلامی ایران، مؤسسۀ تألیف، ترجمه و نشر آثار هنری (متن). https://matnpub.ir/product/1393
کیبل، ب. (۱۳۷۶). آنانداکی کوماراسوامی: محقق عرصه روح (م. هدایتی، مترجم). نقد و نظر، ۴(۳-۴)، ۹۶-۱۱۳.  https://jpt.isca.ac.ir/article_21936_20093e2097568937bca61cd28092c821.pdf
گاتر، ا. (1395). فرهنگ زیباشناسی (م. ابوالقاسمی، مترجم). نشر ماهی. https://isoa.ir/Gooter/1395 (نسخه اصلی منتشر شده در ۲۰۱۰).
گلستان حبیبی، م. (1388). عالم خیال و تخیل هنری در عرفان اسلامی. در م. کنگرانی (گردآورنده)، مجموعه مقالات دومین هم اندیشی تخیل هنری. فرهنگستان هنر جمهوری اسلامی ایران، مؤسسۀ تألیف، ترجمه و نشر آثار هنری (متن). https://matnpub.ir/product/Khial
نصر، س. ح. (1388) معرفت و معنویت (الف. رحمتی، مترجم). دفتر پژوهش و نشر سهروردی. https://esam.ir/item/36017776
نصر، س. ح. (1396). معرفت و امر قدسی (ف. حاجی میرزایی، مترجم). نشر فرزان روز. https://www.takbook.com/lib/1396
نصر، س. ح.، و جهانبگلو، ر. (1385). در جست و جوی امر قدسی: گفت وگوی رامین جهانبگلو با سیدحسین نصر (س. م. شهرآیینی، مترجم). نشرنی. https://elmnet.ir/doc/31023332-61701
نصر، ط. (1386). از هنر و هنر اسلامی. انتشارات نوید شیراز. https://esam.ir/item/337484698469
نقره کار، ع.، حمزه‌نژاد، م.، و فروزنده، آ. (1388). راز جاودانگی آثار معماری (تحلیلی بر نگرش‌های نوگرا و فرانوگرا و رویکردهای فراگیرتر). باغ نظر، ۶(۱۲)، 31-44. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_31.html
یوسفیان، ج. (1379). نگاهی به مفهوم زیبایی‌شناسی. نشریۀ دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی تبریز، ۴۳(۱۷۷)، 135-178. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/16388
Afshar Mohajer, K. (2015). Ethical benefits of traditional arts. In M. Azadehfar (Ed.), Art and Ethics: A Collection of Essays. Sooreh Mehr Publications. http://soorehmehr.ir/book/2376 [In Persian].
Avani, G. (1996). Wisdom and Spiritual Art: A Collection of Essays. Gross. https://elmnet.ir/doc/31050921-24821 [In Persian].
Azizi, A. (2017). Images of the Dome of Sheikh Lotfollah Mosque in Isfahan and the Peacock Design Inside the Dome. Iranian Artists’ Works. Retrieved July 1, 2023, from http://www.azizihonar.com/index.php?newsid=6391#prettyPhoto [In Persian].
Boylston, N. (2008). Ananda Coomaraswamy and the interpretation of symbols (M. Safipour, Trans.).  Journal of the Art Academy2(3), 81–92. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/540233 [In Persian].
Burckhardt, T. (2007). Principles of Islamic Art (A. Nasri, Trans.). Haghighat. https://alaeeketab.com/product/1386 [In Persian].
Burckhardt, T. (2011). Principles of Christian Art (A. Nasri, Trans.). Hekmat. https://www.hekmat-ins.com/product/1390 [In Persian].
Coomaraswamy, A. (1973). What is common to Indian and Chinese art? Studies in Comparative Religion, 7(2), 1-21. http://www.studiesincomparativereligion.com/uploads/ArticlePDFs/217.pdf
Coomaraswamy, A. (1980-a). Interpretation of symbols. Studies in Comparative Religion, 14(1-2), 1-6. https://www.scribd.com/document/166054158/Ananda-Coomaraswamy-The-Interpretation-of-Symbols
Coomaraswamy, A. (1980-b). Symbols. Studies in Comparative Religion, 14(1-2), 1-3.  http://www.studiesincomparativereligion.com/uploads/ArticlePDFs/348.pdf
Coomaraswamy, A. (2003). An Introduction to Indian Art (A. Zekrgo, Trans.). Rosane Publishing. https://yassavoli.com/product/4799385 [In Persian].
Coomaraswamy, A. (2010). Art and Traditional Symbolism (S. Tabatabai, Trans.). Academy of Arts of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Institute for Compilation, Translation, and Publication of Artistic Works (MATN). https://matnpub.ir/product/2/1393 [In Persian].
Coomaraswamy, A. (2011). Traditional Foundations of Art and Life: A Reflection on the Book the Dance of Shiva by Ananda Coomaraswamy (A. Zekrgoo, Trans.). Academy of Arts of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Institute for the Compilation, Translation, and Publication of Artistic Works (MATN). https://dlfreeroman.ir/fa/novel/sellbook/book/112109 [In Persian].
Coomaraswamy, A. (2012) The Transformation of Nature into Art (S. Tabatabaei, Trans.). Academy of Arts of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Institute for the Compilation, Translation, and Publication of Artistic Works (MATN). https://matnpub.ir/product/1391 [In Persian].
Coomaraswamy, A. (2014). Philosophy of Christian and Eastern Art (A. Zekrgo, Trans.). Academy of Arts of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Institute for the Compilation, Translation, and Publication of Artistic Works (MATN). https://matnpub.ir/product/1393 [In Persian].
Dadashi, A. (2004). A religious perspective on some characteristics of traditional art and folk art. Farhang-e Mardom-e Iran [Culture of the People of Iran], 3–4, 40–47. https://www.noormags.ir/view/ar/1017357 [In Persian].
The Decoration of the Dome Chamber Ceiling of the Sheikh Lutfollah Mosque, Isfahan [Museum image]. (n.d.). Pinterest. Retrieved June 16, 2023, from https://www.pinterest.com/pin/282389839129361892/
Golestan Habibi, M. (2009). The World of Imagination and Artistic Imagination in Islamic Mysticism. In M. Kangrani (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Artistic Imaginagtion. Academy of Arts of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Institute for the Compilation, Translation and Publication of Artistic Works (MATN). https://matnpub.ir/product/Khial [In Persian].
Guter, A. (2016). Aesthetic A-Z (M. Abolghasemi, Trans.). Mahi Publication. https://isoa.ir/Gooter/1395 (Original work published 2010). [In Persian].
Hanash, A. M. (2022). The Theory of Islamic Art : Aesthetic Concept And Epistemic (S. Fadavi, Trans.). Negah-e Moaser. https://alefbalib.com/MetaData/793680 (Original work published in 2017) [In Persian].
Kamali Dolatabadi, R. (2017). Mystical Rereading of the Fundamentals of Visual Arts. Sooreh Mehr Publications. https://sooremehr.ir/book/2847 [In Persian].
Keeble, B. (1998). Anandaki Coomaraswamy: A Researcher in the Realm of the Soul (M. Hedayati, Trans.). Naqd va Nazar [Critique and Reflection], 4(3-4), 14-19. [In Persian].
Khatami, M. (2014). A Philosophical Prelude to Iranian Art. Academy of Arts of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Institute for Compilation, Translation, and Publication of Artistic Works (MATN). https://matnpub.ir/product/1393 [In Persian].
Nasr, S. H. (2009). Knowledge and Spirituality (A. Rahmati, Trans.). Suhrawardi Research and Publication Office. https://esam.ir/item/36017776 [In Persian].
Nasr, S. H. (2017). Knowledge and the Sacred Order (F. Haji Mirzaei, Trans.). Farzan Rooz Publishing. https://www.takbook.com/lib/1396 [In Persian].
Nasr, S. H., & Jahanbegloo, R. (2006). In Search of the Sacred: A Conversation between Ramin Jahanbegloo and Seyyed Hossein Nasr (S. M. Shahraiyini, Trans.). Nashr-e Ney. https://elmnet.ir/doc/31023332-61701 [In Persian].
Nasr, T. (2007). On Art and Islamic Art. Navid Shiraz Publications. https://esam.ir/item/337484698469 [In Persian].
Noghrekar, A., Hamzenejad, M., & Forouzande, E. (2009). Eternity secret of architectural works (In modernism, post modernism and more inclusive view). Bagh-e Nazar, 6(12), 31-44. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_31.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Oldmeadow, H. (2011). Traditionalism Religion in the Light of the Perennial Philosophy (R. Koorang Beheshti, Trans.). Hekmat. https://elmnet.ir/doc/30825540-50261 (Original work published 2000). [In Persian].
Pakbaz, R. (201۶). The Encyclopedia of Art. Farhang-e-Moaser. https://ajansbook.ir [In Persian].
Piroozram,S. and Binaye Motlagh,S. (2014). The Examination of Creativity in Traditional Art. Sophia Perennis (Jāvīdān Khirad), 10(2), 29-46. https://www.javidankherad.ir/article_32903.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Quinn, W. (2016). The Only Tradition (R. Ghasemian, Trans.). Hekmat. https://www.hekmat-ins.com/product/1395 [In Persian].
Rikhtegaran, M. (2018). Art, Beauty, Thought: A Reflection on the Theoretical Foundations of Art. Nashr-e Saqi. https://yassavoli.com/product/4799408 [In Persian].
Safavi, S. (2018). Foundations of the Philosophy of Islamic Art. Academy of Iranian Studies, London. https://iranianstudies.org/fa/1397/09/13 [In Persian].Faghfouri, M. (2009). Traditionalists, beauty, and the hierarchy of art. Journal of the Art Academy, 2(3), 56-71. https://elmnet.ir/doc/1097738-79115 [In Persian].
Schuon, F. (1998). Aesthetics and symbolism in art and nature (M. Azad, Trans.). Naqd va Nazar [Critique and Reflection], 4(15–16), 127–136. https://jpt.isca.ac.ir/article_21939.html [In Persian].
Shad Ghazvini, P., & Edraki, M. (2020). Analysis of the Shamseh motif by the Ibn Arabi's Thoughts and Mysticism theories. Journal of Islamic Crafts. 4(1), 1-11. https://jih-tabriziau.ir/article-1-84-fa.html [In Persian].
Yousefian, J. (2000). A look at the concept of aestheticsJournal of the Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tabriz, 43(177), 135–178. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/16388 [In Persian].
Zavarian, Z. (2017). I Have Seen the Paradise: Reflections on the Philosophy of Western, Eastern, and Islamic Arts— A Conversation with Amirhossein Zekrgou. Naghde Farhang. https://www.naqdefarhang.com/product/1396 [In Persian].
Zekrgou, A. (1999). A reflection on the ideas of Coomaraswamy. Nameh-ye Farhangestan-e Olum [Journal of the Academy of Sciences], 14–15, 61–76. https://www.noormags.ir/view/ar/articlepage/748580 [In Persian].