The Integration of Art and Politics in the Portraiture of Shah Ismail I from the Safavid Era to the Qajar Period

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.A. in Archaeology. Faculty of Conservation. Art University of Isfahan. Iran.

2 Assistant Professor. Department of Archaeology. Faculty of Conservation. Art University of Isfahan. Iran.

3 Associate Professor. Department of Archaeology. Faculty of Literature and Humanities. Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: The ascension of Shah Ismail I, the founder of the Safavid dynasty, in the 10th century AH brought about significant transformations in the political, social, religious, and artistic realms. During this period, a shift towards realism and the reflection of personal emotions in portraiture became prominent, aiming to convey values and power through the above mentioned art
Purposes & Questions: This research aims to identify and examine the portraits of Shah Ismail I and the reasons for the continuity of his portraiture in subsequent periods. The research question is as follows: What are the characteristics of the portraiture of Shah Ismail I and why has the portraiture of Shah Ismail I continued into the periods after the Safavid era? Therefore, this study revolves around the characteristics of Shah Ismail I's portraiture and its persistence in later periods.
Methods: The research employs a descriptive-analytical and historical method, utilizing data obtained through library research and field studies. The statistical population includes 51 portrait works of Shah Ismail I, not only from the Safavid era, but also spanning centuries after the collapse of the Safavid dynasty under the subsequent rule.
Findings & Results: Shah Ismail I's portraiture, beyond depicting the physical features of his face, served the purpose of promoting and solidifying his royal authority and propagating the Safavid government. These portraits were used as tools to showcase the stable rule of the Safavid kings and justify their power in comparison to others. In some instances, the depiction of Shah's portraits by foreign governments symbolized his power and grandeur, serving as symbols of political relations. The portraits vividly capture Shah Ismail I's physical attributes, portraying him as a charismatic and well-built man with red hair, fair skin, and a serious and determined face. Typically depicted in formal royal attire with crown and throne, his portraits symbolize power, splendor, and praise. These artworks not only reflect his physical appearance, but also act as powerful tools for preserving Safavid history and culture, legitimizing subsequent Safavid kings and Shia governments. The earliest known portrait of Shah Ismail is a miniature painting from the 16th century AD. It depicts the young Shah wearing a turban and a long robe, with a sword at his side. The painting is notable for its realistic depiction of the Shah's features, including his sharp nose and dark eyes. In the 17th century AD, portraiture of Shah Ismail became more stylized. Paintings of the Shah often depicted him as a larger-than-life figure, with idealized features and a regal bearing. This shift in style reflects the growing power and prestige of the Safavid dynasty. The study and analysis of Shah Ismail I's portraits during the Safavid era reveal that this artistic expression served not only as a representation of the ruler's physical appearance, but also as a potent tool for promoting the Safavid government and conveying cultural values. The characteristics of Shah Ismail I's portraiture, including charm, splendor, and authority, have endured as symbols of the stability and elevation of the Safavid rule. The persistence of these portraits in later periods, especially during the Zand and the Qajar eras, can be attributed to political, historical, and identity-driven reasons, emphasizing the authenticity and legitimacy of Shah Ismail I as a significant historical figure in Iran. The Qajar dynasty, which ruled Iran from 1794 to 1925 AD, continued the tradition of depicting Shah Ismail as a heroic figure. However, Qajar portraits of the Shah often incorporate Western influences, such as the use of perspective and shading. The portraiture of Shah Ismail I by Iranian and European artists resulted in different artistic works, pursuing distinct goals, styles, and artistic techniques. In Iranian portraiture of the king, the face is depicted in a three-quarter view with vivid and intense colors, bold and thick lines, and a simple and focused composition. On the other hand, the European portraiture style presents the king's face in a half-profile view, using soft colors and symmetrical compositions. These artists pay closer attention to precision and realism in facial depiction, presenting a more detailed portrayal of the natural features and emotions of Shah Ismail I. In conclusion, the continuity of Shah Ismail I's portraiture beyond the Safavid era serves not only to perpetuate cultural and historical influences, but also to showcase the enduring cultural impact of the Safavid ascendancy. The portraits act as a testament to the ruler's charisma, power, and historical significance, contributing to the portrayal of Iran's rich cultural and political heritage. The portraits of the Safavid Shah Ismail I are important works of art that provide a glimpse into the history and culture of Iran. They are also a testament to the power of portraiture to capture the essence of a person and a time.

Keywords


Aliyev, E., & Abdullayeva, R. (2019, February 23). Shah Ismail’s image on 16th century European engravings [Conference presentation]. International Conference Scientific Researches for Development Future, (p.p. 5-10). https://www.academia.edu/38776195/SHAH_ISMAILS_IMAGE_ON_16TH_CENTURY_EUROPEAN_ENGRAVINGS
Ayatollahi, H., Khajeh Ahmad Attari, A., Shirazi, A., Marathi, M., & Ghazizadeh, K. (2012). A study of anthropomorphism in the painting of the Isfahan school in the 10th and 11th centuries AH. Comparative Art Studies, 2(4), 81-92. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/490048/1391 [In Persian].
Babaei, S. (2019). Isfahan and its Palaces: Statecraft, Shiism, and Festive Architecture at the Beginning of Modern Iran (M. Amiri, Trans.). Farhang Javid. https://agahbookshop.com/1398b [In Persian].
Babaie, S. (1994). Shah Abbas II, the conquest of Qandahar, the Chihil Sutun, and its wall paintings. Muqarnas. 11, 125-142. https://www.academia.edu/10227783/Shah_Abbas_II_the_Conquest_of_Qandahar_the_Chihil_Sutun_and_Its_Wall_Paintings
Barbaro, G. (2011). Travels in Persia by Caterino Zeno. In H. E. J. Stanley & C. Grey (Eds.), W. Thomas & E. A. Roy (Trans.), Travels to Tana and Persia, and a Narrative of Italian Travels in Persia in the 15th and 16th Centuries (pp. 199–264). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/2011
Barbaro, G., Contarini, A., Zeno, K., Anjollo, J. M., & Dalsandri, V. (2002). Venetian Travelogues in Iran (M. Amiri, Trans.). Khwarizmi. https://asmaneketab.ir/product/Venizian [In Persian].
Binyon, L., Wilkinson, J. W. S., & Gray, B. (2017). An Analytical History of Iranian Miniature Painting (M. Iranmanesh, translator). Amir Kabir. https://bookroom.ir/book/90050 (Original work published 1971). [In Persian].
Blochet, E. (1975). Musulman Painting: XIIth – XVIIth Century (C. M. Binyon, & E. D. Ross, Introduction writers). Hacker Art Books. https://www.abebooks.com/Musulman-Painting-xIIth-XVIIth-Century-Translated/15686707960/bd
Canby, S. R. (2006). Safavid Art and Architecture (M. Movahed, Trans.). Academy of Art. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1397318 [In Persian].
‎Canby, S. R. (2007). The Golden Age of Iranian Art (1501-1722 AD) (H. Afshar, Trans.). Markaz Publishing, Mad Book, Maryam Book. https://www.gisoom.com/book/11087729C [In Persian].
Canby, S. R. (2009). Shah Abbas: the Remaking of Iran. The British Museum Press. https://archive.org/details/shahabbasremakin0000canb
Ghasemi Gonabadi, M. Q. (2008). Shah Ismail Nameh (J. Shoja Kayhani, Ed.). Persian Language and Literature Academy. https://noo.rs/rmW0V [In Persian].
Grabar, O. (2004). Mostly Miniatures: an Introduction to Persian Painting (M. Vahdati Daneshmand, Trans.). Academy of Art. https://matnpub.ir/product1383 (Original work published 2000). [In Persian].
Haghayegh, A., & Fahimifar, A. (2018). A critical reading of visual representation of the Chaldiran Battle on the Isfahan's Chihilsutun Palace. Historical Studies, 9(1), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.30465/hcs.2018.3257 [In Persian].
Khandamir, G. B. H. (2001). Tārīkh-i Ḥabīb al-Siyar fī Akhbār-i Afrād-i Bashar [The Beloved's History in the Accounts of the People] (J. Homaee, Introduction writer; M. Dabir Siyaqi, Ed.). Khayyam. https://fa.wikinoor.ir/wiki/1380 [In Persian].
Mirkhwand, M. K. (2001). The History of Ruza Al-Safa in the Life of the Prophets and the Muluks and the Khalifs (J. Kian Far, Ed.). Asatir. https://fa.wikinoor.ir/wiki/1380m [In Persian].
Mohebbi, B., Hassankhani Qavam, F., & Amani, M. (2018). Studying the relationship between social status and the choice of clothing color in Safavid period paintings. Journal of Iranian Handicrafts Studies (Honar-haye Sana'ee-ye Iran), 3(1), 127-139. http://noo.rs/3kmC0  [In Persian].
Munshi, A. (2002). Tārīkh-i ‘Ālam-ārā-yi ‘Abbāsī [The World-Adorning History of Abbas] (I. Afshar, Ed.). Amirkabir. https://noo.rs/QSKWw [In Persian].
Musavvir, Mu'in (Creator). (1650). History of Shah Isma'il [Printed book-illustration]. The British Library. (Source: Or. 3248, f.53). Retrieved May 05, 2022,  https://imagesonline.bl.uk/asset/10463/
Orbay, Ayşe .(2000). The Sultan's Portrait: Picturing the House of Osman: [Topkapi Palace Museum in Istanbul Between June 6 and September 6, 2000
ExposicionesTopkapı Sarayı Müzesi] (S. Kangal, Ed.; P. M. Isin, Trans.). Isbank.
Özgüdenli, O.  G. (2006). Ottoman-Persian relations i. under Sultan Selim I and Shah Esmaʿil I. In E. Yarshater (Ed.), Encyclopedia Iranica. The Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation, Inc. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/ottoman-persian-relations-i-under-sultan-selim-i-and-shah-esmail-i
Rizvi, K. (2012). The suggestive portrait of Shah ‘Abbas: Prayer and likeness in a Safavid Shahnama. The Art Bulletin, 94(2), 226–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.2012.10786039
Salmasizadeh, J. (1960). Shahnameh Qasemi or Shahnameh Shah Ismail. Journal of Vahid, 7(84), 1520-1525. [In Persian].
Sheikh Safi Blessing Shah Isma’il: Safavid Isfahan, School of Mu’in Musawwir, Iran, 17th Century. (17c.). The Christie’s Museum. Retrieved March 15, 2023, from https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-4685043
Soudavar, A. (2001). Iranian Court Art (N. Mohammad Shamirani, Trans.; A. Dehghani, Ed.). Karang. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1216098 [In Persian].
Taner, M. (2018). An Illustrated Genealogy between the Ottomans and the Safavids. In G. Necipoğlu, & M. J. Metzler (Eds.), An Annual on the Visual Cultures of the Islamic World (Vol. 35, pp. 145-173). Brill. Retrieved Jaunary 23, 2024, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329660832
Thevet, A. (Illustrator). (1584). Hismael Sophi, Roy de Perse [Print book-illustration]. The British Musium. (Museum Number 1879,1213.313). Retrieved March 15, 2023, from https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/P_1879-1213-313
Vahid Qazvini, M. (2004). History of the Abbasid World (S. Mir Mohammad Sadeq, Ed.). Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. https://noo.rs/rlOzJ  [In Persian].
 
Volume 20, Issue 75
October 2025
Pages 12-14
  • Receive Date: 18 June 2024
  • Revise Date: 01 December 2024
  • Accept Date: 20 December 2024