Negareh Journal

Negareh Journal

Semiotics and symbolic logic of Iranian Garden Features using Designed Features in Kahsan Fin Garden

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 nezamedin emamifar, PH.D, Assistant professor, faculty of art, shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
2 M.A, Lecturer, art University, semnan, iran.
Abstract
Knowing Iranian gardens and the specially belong to those factors lead to recognition of symbolization from nature. Undoubtedly, one of the best manifestations of the appearance and meaning that emerged from the Iranian beliefs is Iranian garden. If we like to know Iranian garden as an example of Paradise, which is located a pool on the middle of it where four streams go out, then would be the closest sample to this archetype. Fin garden in compare with some other Iranian garden under evaluation, because of its two linear and width wise avenues in spite of many differences in appearance quality near to each other and because of brooks in the middle that cut off their axis in the pool inside the Villa, will be one of the most nearest samples to its own instance. Kashan Fin garden regarding its construction (space making factor) , output (view making factors) ,and aesthetics (decorative factors) among other Iranian garden in its own historical time has the most complete decoration on garden and their factors also refer to philosophical meanings or symbolic pictures . In this regard, the frame of the contextual study of Kashan Fin Garden was closed. In this issue by the theory and method of semiotic science tried to work on meanings, values characteristics and special semiotics systems in the features of Iranian gardens, and how different factors in Iranian garden effect on each other and they produce which values to make a relationship among the most accepted scientific principles of semiotics factors and environmental design of Iranian gardens` features. This paper is the application and methods of doing it - is descriptive, inquiry. Sampling was based on selection and the analysis of information was qualitative.
Keywords

میرباقری، مهری، مقدمات زبان شناسی، قطره، چاپ یازدهم، 1378
سجودی، فرزان، نشانه شناسی کاربردی، مجموعه نشانه شناسی و زبان شناسی1 نشر تهران، 1387.
احمدی  بابک، ساختار و تإویل متن، نشر مرکز،1370.
چندلردانیال، مبانی نشانه شناسی،ترجمه مهدی پارسا، انتشارات سوره ی مهر، چاپ دوم، 1378.
سجودی، فرزان.نشانه شناسی، نظریه و عمل، نشر تهران علم، سال 1388.
شمیسا، سیروس، بیان، میترا، چاپ سوم، زمستان 1387.
بلخاری قهی  حسن، مبانی عرفانی و هنر معماری اسلامی، دفتر اول و دوم، پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و هنر اسلامی، 1388.
سلطان زاده حسین، تداوم طراحی باغ ایرانی در تاج محل، دفتر پژوهشهای فرهنگی، 1378.
باغ ایرانی، حکمت کهن منظر جدید، موزه هنرهای معاصر تهران، پاییز 1383.
حمید رضا جیحانی، عمرانی، سید محمد علی، باغ فین،پژوهشگاه میراث فرهنگی و گردشگری و صنایع دستی، چاپ اول،1386.
اردلان، نادر، بختیار، لاله، حس وحدت،ترجمه شاهرخ، حمید، اصفهان، نشر خاک، 1379.
فرشته ی نائینی.کتاب حیات در حیاط نزهت،تهران 1381.
 
chandler.daniel,:semiotics.the basics.london:routledge ,2002.
Eco.umberto,:A theory of semiotics.bloomington.in :Indiana University press/London:Macmillan  ,1979.
jakobson.Roman,“language in relation  to other communication systems”.in roman Jacobson: selected writings.VOL2.Mouton:The Hague ,1971.
chandler.daniel, :semiotics.the basics.london:routledge ,2002.
www.iranian garden
Volume 6, Issue 17
Winter 2011
Pages 59-71

  • Receive Date 03 February 2011
  • Accept Date 04 June 2011
  • Publish Date 21 March 2011