A Comparative Study of the Picture of Women and Accompanying Motifs in Mesopotamian Artifacts and Lorestan Pinheads Based on Yung’s Archetype

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student in Archeology, Department of Archeology, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University of Varamin

2 Associate Professor, Department of Archeology, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University of Varamin,

10.22070/negareh.2022.14814.2826

Abstract

By examining the historical roots in the culture of beliefs and convictions of societies, we encounter narratives and myths which play a colorful role in the formation of the visual culture of past nations and civilizations. According to a tradition, the content of myths reflects ethnic customs and traditions, beliefs, and cultural approaches of societies, which have been manifested in art, which can be examined in the form of archetypes. Therefore, in spite of all the complexities, there is a kind of harmony and closeness in their main themes in the mythological archetypes, which makes a comparative study of these narrations possible .One of the oldest mythological archetypes is the myth of the mother goddess and goddess, which is one of the most influential and meaningful gods in the lives of ancient people. The oldest of them is called the goddess Inana which dates back to 3500 BC. In Mesopotamia whose image and symbols have been displayed in the art of different historical periods of Mesopotamia. the text of this myth is written on twenty tablets and several fragments and is kept in the museum of the Ancient East of Istanbul, the museums of universities of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia and, Bail. The tablets were read and studied by Kramer. The Sumerian text of the poem was published in 1952 AD by the University of Pennsylvania museum. the story consists of three parts, which are :1- the relationship of Inana, the queen of Heaven with Enki, the god of water, wisdom and motto 2- the marriage of Inana and Dumuzì, which is known as the Holy marriage 3- the journey to earth is irreversible. On the other hand, in Lorestan region, bronze artifacts with a female motif have been obtained, which belong to the first and the second millennia BC.  Works and their designs can be considered as links between the civilizations of Mesopotamia and the art of ancient Iran. These motifs in terms of form, structure, and aesthetic principles reflect the beliefs and beliefs of ancient people therefore, it is necessary to study these works based on new approaches and theories. Therefore the purpose of this study is to represent and to express common features between images of women in Lorestan bronzes and Mesopotamian goddesses based on comparative and in textual studies to identify the religious beliefs of this period and its relationship with Mesopotamian civilization .Now, considering the proximity of these two regions and the background of the presence of the female goddess in Mesopotamian mythology and art and its role in the applied arts of  Lorestan region, the purpose of this study is to identify the visual relationship between the role of women in the pinheads of  Lorestan and the Mesopotamian goddess in order to discover the common intellectual heritage between these two regions. The questions raised in the research are:

What common aspects and differences are observed between the role of women in the works of Lorestan and the Mesopotamian goddesses?
According to Young’s archetypes, how are the common cultural ties between the two regions interpreted?

 Research method: the research method in this articles is descriptive  analytical, in the process of which, while introducing and describing the content and features of Inana myth, the analysis of works of art has been done, which deals with Mesopotamian cylindrical seals and bronze works of Lorestan. The data collection tool is library-based, thus, the role of Inana -Ishtar in the cylindrical seals of the old Sumerian to Cassian period was first investigated based on the two catalogs of Null and the catalog of William and Moory to achieve the goal. Then, the bronze works of Lorestan with the motif of a woman were studied. Thus, 114 objects of Lorestan bronze objects were examined. Among them, 60 objects had female motifs. For this study, only female motifs on circular pins were used, and 20 of them were selected for comparative comparison with Mesopotamian seals’ designs. In this way, images were created from the designs created of the goddess Inana Ishtar on Mesopotamian works and the motif of a woman on the head of Lorestan bronze pins, and the analysis of these motifs is based on design, composition, visual elements, and archetypes. Result: The results show that the institutional philosophical thought in the myth of the female goddess is procreation and fertility and the inhabitants of both lands had similar concepts of the female goddess. The style of show in the art of both societies is realistic, but there is a difference in the style of execution. According to archetypes, the difference in appearance and coverage is the result of the environmental and historical conditions of societies. Thus, the people of both regions were influenced by regional beliefs to express their mythical ideas.

Keywords


Albenda, P, the Queen of the Night Plaque, A Revisit. JAOS 125/1, 2005,171-190.
Alizadeh, S, A study of the Relationship between Paint and Application in pinhead Lorestan,Jurnal of  Visual and applied Art, No 29, 2017, pp109-126
Amozegar,Zhaleh, 2001 ,Mythical history of Iran, Tehran, Samt Publication,.
Argail, M Yung and Religius Symbolism, Translates by Ahmad Reza Mohammadpour, Journal of Critique and Opinion, No 37-38,2005, pp1-18
Ayazi, S, 2008, Disc- Head Bronze Pins from Lurestan,a symbol of ancient Iran's art, Printed in Germany.
Black, J, Green, A, 2004, An Illustrated Dictionary Gods, Demons and Symbols, The British Museum Press.
Cabrea,R,The Three faces of Inanna: an Approach to her Polysemic figure in figure in her descent to the Netherworld, Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages, Vol 44 (2),2018,pp 41-79
Campbell,J (1998) the power of Myth, translated by Abbas Mokhber, Tehran, Markaz Publishing.
Collins, P, 1994, The Sumerian Goddess Inanna(3400-2200BC). PLA5,103-118.
Dadvar,Abolghasem, Message Ardakani, Nusrat Al -Muluk ,a survey of opinions on the origin of Lorestan bronzes ,scientific – research journal of the faculty of Literature and Humanities , university of Isfahan , volume 2 ,no  48, 2007, pp.127 -154.
Dubocor,M (1997), The Living secrets of John, Translated by Jalal Sattari, First edition,Second Vollume, Center Tehran
Esmailpour, A, The Concept of Myth, Book of the Month of Art, No 27, 2000, pp.16-25
Frankfort, H, 1939, Cylinder Seals: A Documentary Essay on the Art and Religion of the Ancient Near East. London: Macmillanand Co.
Hall, James, 2011, Culture of Symbols in East and West, (Translated bt Roghayeh Behzadi), Tehran, Publication Frahang Moaser.
Hatam,Gh, A,  Role and Symbol in Ancient Iranian Pottert, Art Quarteely, No 47, 1995, pp 355-378
Harris, R, Inanna-Ishtar as Paradox and a Coincidence of Opposities.HR 30/3, 1991.261-278
Irvani Moghadam, F, Hessari,M, Beik Mohammadi,Kh ,Typology and Attitude to Theory Bronze Disc Pinhead of Lorestan, Journal of Archaeology of Cultural Persia, Vol 1,No 1.,Autumn& Winter 2013.pp 37-56
Jacobsen, Th, Ancient Mesopotamian Religion: The Central Concerns. PAPS 107/6, 1963,473-484
Krimer, S,2006, Sumerian Tablets, Translated by Davood Rasasei, Third edition, scientific and cultural publications, Tehran
Majidzadeh, Yousof ,1991, History and Civilization of Eilam, Publication Elmi Farhangi.
Majidzadeh, Yousof, 1988, Dating of Lorestan Bronzepins, Journal of Archaeology and History, Vol 1,pp.3-10
Malekzadeh, Mehrdad, 2005, Preliminary descriptive report of the three chapters of the first rescue excavations of Sangtarashan in Khoramabad, Tehran, Archaeological Research Institute Cultural Heritage Organization.
Mirzaei, R., Biravnand,Y.A., Sajadi,A, Study and analysis of fertility symbols on bronze pins in Lorestan, Journal of Women in Culture and Art,Vol 11(1),2009,pp47-62
Newell, E.T(1934), Ancient Oriental Seals in the collection, the university of Chicago Press, Chicago,USA.
Porada, E , Why Cylinder Seals?Engraved Cylindrical Seal Stones of the Ancient Near East, Fourth to First Millennium B.C.Art Bulletin 75/4,1993,pp 563-582.
Salek Akbari, M.H, Hozhabri Nobari, A, Afhami, R ,Iconography of Iron age pin head paint, Iranian Archaeology Resarch, Vol 9, 2019, No,23.pp 71-90
Saraf, M.H ,2005, The Religion of the Elamite Peaple, Tehran, Publication Center.
Schmidt,E 1938, The Second Holmes Expedition to Lurestan, Bulletin of the American Institute for Iranian Art Archaeology, Vol V, pp 205- 216.
Sonik, K, Breaching the Boundaries of Being: Metamorphoses in the Mesopotamian Literary Texts.JAOS 132/3,2012,pp385-393
Shishegar, Arman (2005), Report of  The Sorkh dom Laki site (2000-2004), Archaeological Resarch Institue, Tehran, Research Deputy of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts, and Tourism Organization.
Vandijk, R M,2016, The form, Function and Symbolism of Standards in Ancient Mesopotamia during the Third and Fourth Millennia BCE:An Iconographical Study. Unpublished Ph.d, Stellenbosch University. Available online at http:// Scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/98400 (accessed 25 June 2018)
William,M and Moore,H (1940), Ancient Oriental cylinder and other seals the collection, the University of Chicago Press,Chicago,USA.
Yung, K(2007), Human and his Symbols, translated by Mahmud Soltanieh, Tehran, Jami