An Analysis of the Evolution Forms of Metalworking Art throughout the Safavieh Era (With an Emphasis on Bowls and Cups)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Phd Student, Art Research, University of Tehran

2 Professor of Faculty of Visual Arts, University of Tehran

3 , Professor of Faculty of Visual Arts, University of Tehran

10.22070/negareh.2021.14281.2737

Abstract

Safavieh era, as the longest and the most effective era of post-Islamic history, was the flourishing age of industrial arts and handicrafts. Throughout this period, areas of society, religion, economy, and politics gained distinguishable structures; the need for distinction from other countries by officializing the Shi’a religion and defending Safavieh dynasty against other rivals/competitors, reinforced some preliminaries that their outcomes were alterations in the approaches and procedures of craftsmen, artists, and industries in Iran. Despite the gradual development of industry after the rule of king Abbas Safavi, establishing and renewing the industrial workshops in Safavieh era, provided the art with some opportunities to enjoy innovative and creative elements in line with religious, political, social evolutions and commercial relationships with eastern and western territories. In addition, coincidence of this long period of time with the rising of some prominent Persian artists and literary and Iranian Muslim scientists and philosophers, as well as paying attention to and influencing on cultural and commercial relationships with Europeans provided excellent occasions for a significant historical transmission from middle century to a new Iran. Metalworking is reckoned as an important branch of industrial arts that underwent many considerable changes due to its long background in manufacturing and producing through the different historical periods. Clearly, during the Safavieh era, these changes due to effective factors on structures of government and society became more solid and distinctive. It seems that industrial arts in the Safavieh era had a direct relationship with the condition of unions and social-religious conditions of society. Different classes of society, from market to mosque, Saqakhaneh and Zurkhaneh, from palace and seraglio to fortune tellers’ astrolabes, all contributed to forming metalworking art and its revolutions. These revolutions emerged from the heart of social, religious, economic, and political structures and in this study two of them- social and religious approaches- will be analyzed. The purpose of the present study is to identify underpinnings of evolutions in the structure of form and function of metalworking arts on the flow of two important approaches throughout the Safavieh era, that are religious and social ones, as well as verification of significant and unified content of metalworking art in this era in metallic bowls and cups. The proposed research questions are as follows: 1. How are the effects of religious and social approaches on metalworking in the Safavieh era defined? 2. What are the contents of the form and function of evolutions in metallic objects throughout the Safavieh era? Research design is descriptive-analytic with a qualitative approach. The data collection method is libertarian and field study. Case studies are metallic bowls and cups and the sampling method was studying private collections, museum samples, and field research. Analysis was performed on details of form, function, and symbols of Safavieh-era bowls and cups, and comparative analogy with other samples would define them. The results of the present study show that defining evolution affected by a religious factor during the Safavieh era appears like Shi’a concepts in epigraphs and images. At once, a social indicator that exhibits those ancient Iranian concepts evolves in both form and meaning among unions and craftsmen. However, what leads these results to a different direction regarding the metallic objects of this era is the similarity with the meaning of objects’ role that apparently has different forms and functions. Deeper layers of meaningful content in different historical sections especially in the Safavieh era can be investigated. To respond to the first research question, it is noteworthy that both social and religious approaches had some impact on each other and on metalworking art during the Safavieh era as well. Analyzing indicators of both approaches identifies a kind of evolution that refers to diversity in the metallic bowls. That means throughout an age when artists are ritualistic and myth-centered, they utilize metallic bowls for magic and hex, ancient medicinal sorcery, or evoking evil spirits from the human body. When we reach an era in which they do not believe in myths, and ritualistic and religious beliefs have been replaced, the form of the bowls and their type change. The second research question has been responded in such a way that in the Safavieh era old beliefs existed in lower layers of the implications of bowls and there was the belief that metal and incantation could eliminate evil and wickedness and conflict with them. Simultaneously, a number of ayahs of holly Quran and some prayers written in Arabic-numerical letters (Abjad) along with some particular symbols were inscribed on bowls in order to conflict with evil and spiritual forces; such as the bowls that were supposed to help people to get married, to eliminate illness from sick people, or to be used to drink water in shrines. Therefore, pictorial elements have a symbolic nature and determine the manner of connecting to an immaterial world.

Keywords


Amouzgar, J. 2009, Mythical history of Iran, Tehran: Samta..
Bahar, M. 2018,  A few researches in Iranian culture. Tehran: Agah.
Bahar, M. 1983, Research in Iranian mythology, Tehran: Toos.
Boloukbashi, A. 2002, False Al-Sahar, in: The Great Islamic Encyclopedia, Volume 11, pp. 190-194.
Collins, R. 2000, The Sociology of Philosophies, A Global of Intellectual Change, USA: Harvard University Press.
Dale,S.F. 2010, The Muslim Empires of the Ottomans, Safavids and Mughals, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Daneshpajouh, M.T. and Afshar, I. 1966, Journal of Manuscripts, Central Library of the University of Tehran (Fourth Office), Tehran: University of Tehran.
Dehmashgi, J. and Janzadeh, A. 1987, Art Effects in Isfahan, Tehran: Janzadeh Publications.
Dinvai, A. 2002, Akhbar al-Tawwal, Mahmoud Mahdavi Damghani, Tehran: Ney Publishing.
Herbert, T. 1928, Travelsin Persia 1627-29, London.
Ettinghausen, R. and Yarshater, E. 2000, The Brilliant Principles of Iranian Art, Hormoz Abdollahi and Rouin Pakbaz, Tehran: Agah Publishing.
Ettinghausen, R. and Graber, A. 1999, Islamic Art and Architecture, Yaghoub Azhand, Tehran: Samat Publications.
Faiz Kashani. 1992, Ulfatnameh; In ten treatises, by Rasoul Jafarian, Isfahan, 201-219.
Ferrier, R. 1995, Iranian Arts, Parviz Marzban, Tehran: Farzan Rooz Publications.
Lambton, A. 2017, Continuity and Evolution in the Middle History of Iran, Yaghoub Azhand, Tehran: Ney Publishing.
Melikian-chirvani, A.S. 1982, Islamic Metalwork from the Iranian World 8th-18th Centuries, London: Victoria and Albert Museum Catalogue, First(ed).
Meskoob, Sh. 2006, Iranian Identity and Persian Language, Fifth Edition, Tehran: Farzan Rooz Publishing and Research.
Monshi, E. 1971, History of the Abbasid world, edited by Iraj Afshar, Tehran: Amirkabir Publications.
Mortazavi, M. 2008, The importance of tin-plated copper utensils in Safavid metalwork, a collection of articles on industrial arts; Isfahan School Meeting, Tehran: Academy of Arts Publications.
Nasr, S.H. 1974, Religion in Safavid Persia, Iranian Studies, 7:1-2, 271-286.
Necipoglu, G. 1995, The Topkapi Scroll- Geometry and Ornament in Islamic Architecture, USA: Sketchbooks& Albums.
Pazuki, Sh. 2007, The Meaning of Industry in Islamic Wisdom, Sadra Microname, No. 48, 95-106.
Perry, E. 2010, The Rise of Shi'ism in Iran, Cross-Sections Journal, Vol.6, 121-136.
Pope, A. and Ackerman, P. 2008, A Journey in Iranian Art, Vol. 1, Sirus Parham, Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi Publications.
Pour Saleh Amiri, M. 1396, the history of talismans and amulets in Iran (with a selected review of museum works), Qom: Dalil Ma Publications.
Rogers, M.J. & Ward, R.M. 1988, Topkapi Sarayi hazineleri Muhtesem Suleyman Cagl, Berlin: Staarliche Museum Preubischer kulturbesitz, Museum fur Islami Schekunst.
Ranjbar, M. 2005, Introduction and critique of the book Continuity and Transformation in the Middle History of Iran, Ketab-e Maah of History and Geography, June and July, 92-95.
Roxburgh, D. 2001, Prefacing the Image: The Writing of Art History in Sixteenth-Century Iran, Islamic Art and Architecture: Supplements to Muqarnas, Vol. 9, Brill, Leiden, pp 230-240.
Scarcian, G.R. 2005, The History of the Art of Iran, Yaghub Azhand, Tehran: Mowla.
Shimmel, A. 2016, The Secret of Numbers, Fatemeh Tawfiqi, Eighth Edition, Qom: University of Religions and Religions Publications.
Schimmel, A. 1984, Calligraphy and The Islamic Culture, New York : New York University Press.
Shaygan, D. 1995, Henry Corban; Horizons of Spiritual Thought in Iranian Islam, Baqer Parham, Tehran: Forouzan Publications.
Soucek, P. 2004, Calligraphy in the Safavid Period 1501-1576, in : Thompson, J. And Canby, S.R., Hunt For Paradise: Court Arts of Safavid Iran (Milan: Skira 2003)
Tohidi, F. 2007, Basics of metalworking, painting, pottery, weaving and textiles, Tehran: Samira.
Varjavand, P. 1999, Progress and Development Based on Cultural Identity, Tehran: Anteshar Co.
Zaki, M. H. 1987, History of Iranian Industries, Mohammad Ali Khalili, First Edition, Tehran: Iqbal Publications.