An Analytic-contrastive Study on Goat Motifs in Petroglyphs in “Shotorsang” area in Khorasan Razavi and Similar Motifs in Other Regions in Iranian Plateau

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor of Visual Communication, Faculty of Engineering, Golestan University, Gorgan

10.22070/negareh.2020.3123

Abstract

In Iran petroglyphs are widely dispersed and have superficial and conceptual similarities with other cases found throughout the world. The motifs depicted in the petroglyphs, which are categorized among the artworks that have remained from Paleolithic to the contemporary era, are in fact the result of the lives of humans and societies prior to the invention of the alphabet. Following the invention of the alphabet and writing, this type of imagery lost its prominent presence in human life. The investigation and study of these pieces would help identifying and knowing the cultural context of the people living in that areas, as well as recognizing the geographical and cultural conditions and their way of life. The rock motifs of “Shotorsang” region are one of thousands of petroglyphs found in greater Khorasan and indicate the herdsman and hunting-based lifestyle of humans during the Neolithic. The motifs remaining on these rocks, as other rock motifs, include animal and human shapes, the most frequent of which is the wild goat. Unlike dispersion of various rock motifs in other regions of Iran, plant, symbolic, and abstract motifs are rarely seen in Shotorsang. The role of Goat as one of the most import animals in continuity of human life indicates the significance of this animal which is abundantly found in petroglyphs of Shotorsang. According to historical documents and evidences, wild goat is one of the oldest known symbols in human history, which is observed in ancient Iran since Neolithic period in different forms such as sculptures remaining from Neolithic shelters (Sarab, Ganj Darreh …), paintings on pottery (pottery works excavated from Sialk, Shush, Esmaeilabad …), engravings on utensils or rocks, and so on. Goat is the symbol of water, moon, prosperity, affluence, fertility, and is also the symbol of life. Once upon a time this animal had been worshipped as the embodiment of human fertility and was considered identical with Sumerian fertility god, Tammuz. In Hindu mythology, the goat was considered as a sacrificial animal of the god of fire. In Greek myths, goat has been a sacred animal for Zeus/Jupiter. In Christian art, the goat represents the Curse in the Last Judgment (resurrection). The objective of this study is to introduce and identify the petroglyphs in Shotorsang region and to explore distinct similarities and differences between motifs of this region and various motifs in other regions in Iran, a task that is not still seriously accomplished by researchers. This research aims at answering these questions: 1. what are the properties of wild goat motifs in “Shotorsang” petroglyphs? 2. What are the prominent differences and similarities in design structure, performance, and goat motif variation between the studied area in this research and other motifs in petroglyphs in Iran? The present research is conducted using analytic-descriptive research method. The data collection is done through library research and field study. While conducting field study, after identifying “Shotorsang” area in the last week of August 2019, as a survey, regarding the dispersion of the motifs on the rocks of the identified area, the researcher took many photographs from these motifs as series or as single shots. Approximately, around 80 petroglyphs are found in the “Shotorsang” area. The statistical society of the present study is composed of goat motifs in studied area and the dispersion of this motif in other regions in Iran, including Asbaghteh in Yazd, Jorbat petroglyphs in Khorasan Razavi, Darreh Negran in Saravan, Tappeh Shah Firoozjan in Kerman province, petroglyphs in Khorasan Jonoobi, Asu petroglyphs and also motifs in Erges Sofla in Zand district of Malayer. Regarding the morphology of petroglyphs, existing documents and evidences in relation to the motif of goat, nearly in all Iranian prehistoric cultural centers, it could be mentioned that wild goat motifs in “Shotorsang” area are often drawn in a stylized form with no decorative element using horizontal lines for top body and a few oblique lines for legs. Furthermore, the goats in studied area, similar to motifs of petroglyphs in other regions in Iran, are drawn in side view with one or two horns with short or very tall curves, which does not fit analogously to the animal body. Side view goats are often drawn with two legs, but in some cases goats with three or four legs have been recognized as well. Morphologically and conceptually, there are high degrees of similarities among goat motifs in different regions of Iran, majority of which are carved using petroglyph style. Archeologists, using approximate and relative chronology, have attributed the carving and formation of petroglyphs of “Shotorsang” to Paleolithic period.

Keywords


Afzaltousi, E. (2012). Rug the preserver of wild goat figure since the ancient times, Nagareh Journal, 7(21), 55-67.
Agha Abbasi, Z. (2010). New-found Motifs in Halilrood Basin Area, Shahid Bahonar University Press, Kerman.
Ayatizadeh, A. (2015). Studying petroglyphs of Asbaqth of Yazd, Glory of Art, 6(2), 81-95.
Bakhtiari Shahri, M. (2009). Survey and study of newly found epigraphs from Toos plain, Journal of archeological studies, 1(1), 21-44.
Beikmohammadi, K. , Janjan, M. & Beikmohammadi, N. (2012). Introduction and Analysis of New Found PetrographyMotif of B Set of Sofla Arges(Malayer-Hamedan), Journal of Faculty of Art and Architecture, Department of Archeology, 2 ( 2), 121-140.
Belbasi, A. (2009). Prehistorical Petroglyphs: Nagaran Valley- Saravan, Access Date: April 10, 2020, www.iribnews.ir/fa/news/2415059.
Bezi, K. & Hatam, G. (2013). Myth mining from petroglyphs in Nahook of Saravan and exploring their presence in human life today, Naghshmayeh Journal, 7( 17), 7-15.
Farhadi, Morteza (1999). Museums in Wind: Introducing the Vast New-Found Rock Engravings of Teimareh, Social Sciences, No. 7, 8, 13-61.
Ghasimi, T. &Mohammadi Ghasrian, S. (2011). Iranian Rock Art, A research Collection of 80nyears of Archeology in Iran, (Vol. 2), Through the Efforts of Yousef Hassanzadeh and Sima Miri, Tehran, Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization, Iranian National Museum.
Ghorbani, H. & Sadeghi, S. (2017). Petroglyphs in Mid-east Iran: Documents, Inscriptions, and Semiology of Petroglyphs of South Khorasan Province, Chahar Derakht, Birjand.
Ghorbani, H. (2013). A Report on Archeological and Anthropological Studies about Rock Motifs: South Khorasan Petroglyphs, Archive of Cultural Heritage, Handcrafts and Tourism Organization of South Khorasan province, Unpublished.
Ghorbani, H. , Sadeghi, S. & Hashemi Zarjabad, H. (2015). An Analysis of Motifs in Rock-Carvings of the Greater Khorasan in South Khorasan Province, Journal of Greater Khorasan, 6( 21), 57-82.
Mardani Valandani, A. (2013). An Exploration on the Stylistics of Jorbat Petroglyphs in North Khorasan, National Conference of Iranian Archeology, Achievements, Opportunities and Injuries, Art Faculty, University of Birjand, 57-82.
Mola salehi, H. ; Saeedpor, M. ; Momeni, A. & Bahramzadeh, M. (2007). Archeology of Petroglyph in the South of Ghazvin Province, Jornal of Bastan Pazhuhi, 2 (2), 49-35.
Naseri Fard, M. (2009). Petroglyphs of Iran: Idiographic Signs, Naseri Fard, Khomein.
Nosrati, M. (2014). Shotorsang: A Remembrance from the Depth of Khorasan’s History/ A Petroglyph with Mysterious Motifs, Mehr News agency, Access Date: Dec 6, 2019, https://mehrnews.com.
Pakbaz, R. (2019). Iranian Miniature Since Old Times, Zarrin and Simin, Tehran.
Rashidi Nezhad, M. & Zamanian, M. (2009). Survey and Study of Newly Found Petroglyphs of Haj Mad Farm and Morad Beik Valley in Hamedan, Payam-e Bastanshenas, 6( 11), 89-96.
Rezaei, J. & Kia, S. (1951). A Report on Inscriptions and Figures of Kal-e Jangal, Iranvij Society, Tehran.
Sadeghi, S., Ghorbani, H. R. & Hashemi Zarjabad, H.،(2013).Motifs Investigation of Birjand Khazan Petroglyph from SouthKhorasan/IRAN, Bi- Annual Journal of Restoration Science and Culture Heritage, 6(21), 82-57.
Saffarian, E. & Kamraninejad Sirjani, M. (2018). The Contrast of Wild Goat and Tree Motifs Between Firooz Shah Hill in Sirjan and Soapstone Dishes of Jiroft Civilization, Scientific Journal of Art and Humanity Research, 4 (12), 13-24.
Salehnejad, Zahra (2016). Kamar Maghboula: The First Site of Iranian petroglyphs in Torghabeh, Access Date: Jun 18, 2019, Available in: https://www.kojaro.com.
https://www.beytoote.com/art/