فصلنامه نگره

فصلنامه نگره

پژوهشی بر نشانه‌شناسی نقوش و مضامین سنگ‌قبور گورستان امام‌زاده ابراهیم کیاآباد رودبار و مقایسه تطبیقی آن با آثار مشابه هم‌عصر در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
متینه رستمی پور 1
حبیب شهبازی شیران 2
سید مهدی حسینی نیا 3
1 کارشناس ارشد باستان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، شهر اردبیل، استان اردبیل، ایران.
2 دانشیار و عضو هیئت‌علمی گروه باستان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، شهر اردبیل، استان اردبیل، ایران.
3 پژوهشگر پسادکتری باستان‌شناسی دوران اسلامی، گروه باستان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
10.22070/negareh.2024.19092.3375
چکیده
مقدمه: سنگ‌مزارها را می­توان از ابعاد گوناگونی موردمطالعه قرار داد. ساختار کلی این آثار ازنظر شکل و حضور نقشمایه­‌های تزیینی متنوع، جایگاه و نقش ویژة سنگ‌‌مزارها را در میان باورها، تفکرات و عقاید جوامع گذشته به تصویر می­کشد. در عصر قاجار، اگرچه از تنوع شکلی سنگ‌قبور کاسته می­‌شود، اما این آثار ازنظر عناصر و نقشمایه­‌های تزیینی به اوج خود می‌­رسند و از تنوع بی­‌شماری در نقش و نگار برخوردار می­‌شوند. این پژوهش به بررسی و تحلیل سنگ‌قبور گورستان امام­زاده ابراهیم کیاآباد بخش رودبار می‌پردازد.  
اهداف و سؤال‌ها: اهداف این پژوهش شامل؛ مطالعه شکلی سنگ‌قبور، بازشناسی و نشانه­‌شناسی نقوش و مضامین این آثار و درنهایت ریشه‌­یابی نقوش آن‌ها از طریق مقایسه با سنگ‌قبور مشابه و معاصر در دیگر گورستان­‌های شاخص هم­‌عصر در مناطق مختلف ایران است. در این راستا، پژوهش حاضر در پی پاسخ به سؤالات زیر است:

نقشمایه‌­های تزیینی و کتیبه­‌های سنگ‌قبور گورستان امام­زاده ابراهیم دارای چه ویژگی‌­هایی هستند؟ 2. نقوش و تزیینات روی سنگ‌قبور امام­زاده ابراهیم با سنگ‌مزارهای کدام مناطق قابل‌ قیاس است؟ 3. وجوه اشتراک سنگ‌قبور امام­زاده ابراهیم با دیگر گورستان­‌های هم­‌عصر، بیشتر در کدام نقوش دیده می­‌شود؟

روش‌ها: روش تحقیق حاضر به‌صورت توصیفی– تحلیلی است و اطلاعات با استفاده از شیوه‌های کتابخانه­‌ای و میدانی گردآوری‌شده‌اند.
یافته‌ها و نتایج: نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌­دهد که سنگ‌قبور گورستان امام­زاده ابراهیم از نوع خوابیده ساده و محرابی هستند و ازنظر آرایه‌­های تزیینی، دارای انواع نقوش حیوانی، هندسی، گیاهی و همچنین اشیاء و ابزارآلات جنگی با معانی و مفاهیم متنوع می‌باشند. در کتیبه‌های این سنگ‌مزارها از دو خط نستعلیق و نسخ محلی بهره برده شده است. این آثار ازنظر نشانه­‌شناسی و نقشمایه‌­های تزیینی، قابل‌مقایسه با سنگ‌مزارهای گورستان­‌های مناطق شمال غرب، غرب و مرکز ایران هستند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
سنگ‌قبور
امام‌زاده ابراهیم
کیاآباد
نقشمایه‌های تزیینی
نشانه‌شناسی
دورة قاجار

عنوان مقاله English

A Research on the Semiotics of Tombstone Motifs and Themes of Imamzadeh Ebrahim Kiaabad Roodbar Cemetery and Its Comparative Comparison with Similar Contemporary Works in Iran

نویسندگان English

Matineh Rostamipour 1
Habib Shahbazi shiran 2
Seyyd Mehdi Hosseyni Nia 3
1 M.A. in Archeology. Department of Archaeology. Faculty of Literature and Human Scinces. University of Mohaghegh Ardabili. Ardabil. Iran.
2 Associate Professor. Department of Archeology. Faculty of Literature and Human Scinces. University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil. Iran.
3 Postdoctoral Researcher in Islamic Archaeology. Faculty of Social Sciences. University of Mohaghegh Ardabili. Ardabil. Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction: In the northern geographical region of Iran's Gilan province, like other areas, there are cemeteries dating back to various Islamic eras that could provide comprehensive research on gravestones and the inscriptions on them, shedding light on many unknown aspects regarding the people of this region and their culture. One of these cemeteries is located in the Roodbar county, in the village of Kiaabad around the Imamzadeh Ibrahim shrine. Numerous gravestones from the Islamic period, especially from the late centuries (the Safavid and the Qajar periods), are present at this Imamzadeh. It is worth noting that there are inscriptions on these gravestones, and by studying the carved images on them, one can gain insight into the cultural, social, and religious reconstruction of the studied community. In the studies conducted in the field of identifying and analyzing rock carvings in various regions of the country, so far, no research has been done on the themes and motifs of the tombstones of Imamzadeh Ibrahim Cemetery in the village of Kiaabad, Roodbar district. This article marks a turning point in examining the Islamic-period tombstones of this cemetery from the perspective of formalism, composition, cognitive concepts, and semiotics hidden beyond their decorative motifs. Furthermore, considering the destruction and disappearance of such works in less known areas, studying and researching rock carvings is one of the important subjects that requires attention and investigation.
Purposes & Questions: The purposes of this examination of the tombstone motifs and themes of Imamzadeh Ibrahim Kiaabad Roodbar cemetery and comparing it with other similar works of the same period in Iran are examination and analysis of the tombs' stones and the inscriptions placed on these artifacts, cultural recognition and comparison of the existing inscriptions with other contemporary cemeteries in different regions as well as dating the tombs in the area under study. This study’s questions are: 1-What are the characteristics of the decorative motifs and inscriptions on the tombstones of Imamzadeh Ibrahim cemetery? 2-Which regions have examples comparable to the inscriptions and decorations on Imamzadeh Ibrahim tombs, and to which eras do they predominantly belong? 3- What is the common point between the Imamzadeh Ibrahim tombs and other contemporary cemeteries?
Methods: The research method is presented as fundamental and theoretical in nature, conducted using a descriptive-analytical and historical method. Data collection was carried out through both field and library research methods. The target population of the study includes historical Islamic gravestones from Kiaabad village in the Roodbar region of Gilan, with a total of 21 intact historical gravestones containing various inscriptions, patterns, and decorative elements. After identifying the interred individuals, the study focused on examining and describing the details of the inscriptions, as well as comparing them with similar samples from other regions. Data analysis was qualitatively conducted. In the thematic analysis method, the researchers initially identified and studied gravestones through fieldwork, documented them comprehensively, designed and described them, conducted comparative analysis, and ultimately analyzed the gravestones in the study area. Non-random (selective) sampling method was employed. Computer software such as CorelDraw and Photoshop were also used for better visualization of the patterns.
Findings & Results: The Imamzadeh Ibrahim Cemetery in Kiaabad, with its Qajar period tombstones and decorative motifs, is considered as one of the most important cemeteries in the Gilan province. This cemetery contains a total of 21 intact tombstones, adorned with geometric, floral, animal, objects, tools motifs as well as inscriptions and calligraphy. Among the buried figures, only Ibrahim Khan is mentioned in historical texts, indicating his relative power and regional significance during the Qajar period in this area. The other tombstones in the Imamzadeh Ibrahim Cemetery belong to his family and others. The inscriptions on these tombstones are usually located in the upper half of the tombs, within simple geometric frames with floral decorations, while other decorative motifs are often carved on the lower parts of the tombstones and on their smooth surfaces. The depicted motifs on the tombstones of the Imamzadeh Ibrahim Cemetery can be interpreted to represent aspects of daily material life as well as spiritual meanings beyond. Some motifs encompass both aspects. Two styles of Nastaliq and local Naskh scripts are utilized on these tombstones. Furthermore, these artifacts, in terms of semiotics and decorative motifs, can be compared with the tombstones of cemeteries in northwest, west, and central Iran, mostly dating back to the Qajar era, except for two instances. In general, on the tombstone of Imamzadeh Ibrahim, motifs with religious themes are used more than motifs with non-religious themes; therefore, on all these tombstones, at least one sacred or religious picture can be seen. Non-religious motifs in these works mostly express the thoughts of the deceased person, his occupation, culture and social class, and most of them indicate the greatness, power, pride and zeal of the deceased person.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Tombstones
Imamzadeh Ibrahim
Kiaabad
Decorative Motifs
Semiotics
Qajar Period
بلک، د. (1394). اطلس قالی و فرش (ن. دریایی، مترجم). بنیاد دانشنامه نگاری ایران. https://www.lib.ir/fa/book/94716870 (نسخه اصلی منتشرشده در ۱۹۹۴).
جهانشاهی افشار، ع. (1394). داغ از نشان تا درمان. فرهنگ و ادبیات عامه، 3(5)، 161-183. https://cfl.modares.ac.ir/article-11-5516-fa.html
راوندی، م. (1387). تاریخ اجتماعی ایران. نگاه. https://ketabchi.com/product/167236
ژوله، ت. (1381). پژوهشی در فرش ایران. یساولی. https://icsa.ir/book_treasure.php
کلانی، ر. (1391). تحلیلی بر تحولات عصر رنسانس با تکیه بر نشان‌های خانواد‌ه‌های اشرافی اروپا (ایتالیا، فرانسه، آلمان، انگلستان) [پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد منتشرنشده]. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شاهرود.
کلانی، ر. (۱۳۹۴). مقدمه‌ای بر تاریخ و مبانی نشان شناسی. عصر نوین. https://asrenovinbook.ir/product/%D9%85%D9%82%D8/
کندریک، آ. ف.، و تاترسال، س. ا. س. (۱۳۹۹). قالی‌های دستبافت شرقی و اروپایی (نازیلا. دریایی، مترجم). فرهنگسرای میردشتی. https://yassavoli.com/product/4769590 (نسخه اصلی منتشرشده در ۱۹۲۲).
مجابی، ع.، و فنایی، ز. (1388). پیش‌درآمدی بر تاریخ فرش جهان. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد نجف‌آباد. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1670155/%DA%A9%D8/
مرادویچ، ص. (۱۳۹۴). سفرنامه صفر مرادویچ: سفیر پادشاه لهستان در دربار شاه‌عباس اول (ح. حاجیان‌پور و م. چهرازی، مترجمان). آژنگ. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1117 (نسخه اصلی منتشرشده در ۱۷۷۷).
Bennett, I. , & Franses, M. (1992). The Early european and oriental carpets at boughton. In T. Murdoch (Ed.), Boughton House: the English Versailles (pp. 108-117). Faber and Faber. https://www.abebooks.com/fi
Bennett, I. (2004). Rugs & Carpets of The World. Greenwich. https://www.biblio.com/book/rugs-carpets-world-bennett-editor-ian/d/1375564077
Black, D. (2015). Atlas-e Qali va Farsh (N. Daryaei, Trans.). Iran Encyclopedia Foundation. https://www.lib.ir/fa/book/94716870  (Original work published 1994). [In Persian].
Brown, J. E. (2001). Historical Dictionary of the us Army. Greenwood Publishing Group. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL22365373M/Historical_dictionary_of_the_U.S._Army
Cheesman, C.  (2010). Some Aspects of the ‘Crisis of Heraldry. The Coat of Arms,. 3rd ser. 6, No. 220, 65-80. https://www.academia.edu/6601825/Some_aspects_of_the_crisis_of_heraldry
Frieder, B., K. (2008). Chivalry & the Perfect Prince: Tournaments, Art and Armor at the Spanish Habsburg Court. Truman State University Press. https://books.google.de/books/about/Chivalry_the_Perfect_Prince.html?id=tsiIvJ16AU0C&redir_esc=y
Greaves, K. (2000). A Canadian Heraldic Primer. Heraldry Society of Canada. https://www.google.de/books/edition/A_Canadian_Heraldic_Primer/kJkCuaSvSZkC?hl=de&gbpv=0
Hiltmann, T. (2015). THe Emergence of the word ‘Heraldry’ in the seventeenth  century and the roots of a misconception. The Coat of Arms, 3rd ser. 11(2), 107-116. https://fmg.ac/fr/library/4309-the-emergence-of-the-word-heraldry-in-the-seventeenth-century-and-the-roots-of-a-misconception
Holden, E. S. (1898). A Primer of Heraldry for Americans. The Century Co. https://archive.org/details/primerofheraldry00holdrich
Hooper, N., & Bennett, M. (1996). The Cambridge Illustrated Atlas of Warfare: The Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.de/books/about/The_Cambridge_Illustrated_Atlas_of_Warfa.html?id=Sf8UIynR0koC&redir_esc=y
Jahanshahi Afshar, A. (2015). Scorching: From Marking to Giving Treatment. Culture and Folk Literature, 3 (5), 161-185. http://cfl.modares.ac.ir/article-11-5516-fa.html [In Persian].
Kalani, R. (2013). An Analysis on Evolutions of Renaissance Era Based on Heraldries of European Aristocracy (Italy, France, Germany, & Britain) [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Islamic Azad University of Shahrood Branch. [In Persian].
Kalani, R., (2015). An introduction to the history and basics of symbology. Asre Novin. https://asrenovinbook.ir/product/%D9%85%D9%82%D8/ [In Persian].
Kendrick, A. F., & Tatersal, C. E. C. (2019). Hand-Woven Carpets, Oriental & European (N. Daryaie, Trans.). Farhangsaray-e Mirdashti. https://yassavoli.com/product/4769590 (Original work published 1922). [In Persian].
McAndrew, B. A. (2006). Scotland’ s Historic Heraldry. Boydell Press. https://books.google.de/books/about/Scotland_s_Historic_Heraldry.html?id=QFkI3G31HTMC&redir_esc=y
Mojabi, A., & Fanayie, Z. (2009). Introduction to the History of the World Carpet. Islamic Azad University of NajafAbad. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1670155/%DA%A9%D8/ [In Persian].
Muratowicz, S. (2015). Relacya Sefera Muratowicza Obywatela Warszawskiego Od Zygmunta III. Krola Polskiego dla sprawowania rzeczy wysłanego do Persyi w roku 1602 (H. Hajianpor & M. Chehrazi, Trans.). Azhang. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1117 (Original work published 1777). [In Persian].
National Musums Scatland. (n.d.). Carpet: c. 1620. Museum reference H.SO 20. Retrieved July 25, 2025, from https://www.nms.ac.uk/search-our-collections/collection-search-results?entry=23473
Olsson, N. W. (2018). The Coat of Arms- A symbol of the Family. Swedish American Genealogist, 38(4), 18-20. https://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2861&context=swensonsag
Philadelphia Museum of Art. (n.d.). Admiral Heraldic Carpet: c. 1429-1473. Retrieved July 25, 2025, from https://philamuseum.org/collection/object/55491
Ravandi, M. (2008). Social history of Iran. Neghah. https://ketabchi.com/product/167236 [In Persian].
Stockwell, F. (2004). A Sourcebook for Genealogical Research: Resources Alphabetically by Type and Location. McFarland. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL3290635M/A_sourcebook_for_genealogical_research
The George Washington University Museum and the Textile Museum. (n.d.). Carpet with the Joined Coat of Arms of Queen Maria of Castile and King Alfonso V of Aragon and Sicily. Retrieved July 25, 2025, from https://collections-gwu.zetcom.net/en/collection/item/7980/
The Metropolitan Museum of Art. (n.d.). The Czartoryski Carpet: 17th century. Retrieved July 25, 2025, from https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/450563
Victoria and Albert Museum. (n.d.-a). Carpet: 1550-1600 (made). Retrieved July 25, 2025, from https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O125161/carpet-unknown/
Victoria and Albert Museum. (n.d.-b). Carpet: 1575-1625 (made). Retrieved July 25, 2025, from https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O366790/carpet/
Victoria and Albert Museum. (n.d.-c). The Fremlin Carpet: ca 1640 (made). Retrieved July 25, 2025, from https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O74043/the-fremlin-carpet-carpet-unknown/
Volbroth, C. A. V. (1973). Heraldry of the Worldworld. Blandford. https://www.amazon.com/Heraldry-Blandford-colour-Alexander-Volborth/dp/0713706473
Walker, D. (1997). Flowers under foot; Indian Carpets of the Mughal Era. Metropolitan Museum of Art. https://www.metmuseum.org/met-publications/flowers-underfoot-indian-carpets-of-the-mughal-era
Wise, T., Hook, R., & Walker, W. (1997). Medieval Heraldry. Osprey. https://www.ospreypublishing.com/us/medieval-heraldry-9780850453485/
Zhuleh, T. (2002). A Research on Iranian Carpets. Yassavoli. https://icsa.ir/book_treasure.php [In Persian].
Ahmadzadeh, F., Hosayni, S. H., & Norasi, H. (2018). A research on the recognition of implication & motifs of gooran tribal gravestones in West Islamabad (Ex-Shah Abad1) city. Theoretical Principles of Visual Arts, 3(1), 72-92. https://doi.org/10.22051/jtpva.2018.3936 [In Persian].
Alinezhad, R. (2014). Sefidchah, an image beyond of a cemetery recognition and study on themes and visual motifs of Sefidchah`s cemetery. Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts, 19(2), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2014.51439 [In Persian].
Bagheri, A., fanaei, Z., & Mojabi, S. A. (2023). Analysis of blue-painted horses in Iranian paintings in the tenth to twelfth centuries AH/ sixteenth to eighteenth centuries AD from the Point of View of mysticism, myth and allegory. Negareh, 18(67), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.22070/negareh.2022.14389.2755 [In Persian].
Eliade, M. (2005). Myths and Symbols: Studies in Honor of Mircea Eliade (J. Sattari, Trans.). Nashr-e Markaz. https://www.iranketab.ir/book/22263-mircea-eliade (Original work published 1969). [In Persian].
Faghih Mirzaei, G., Habibi, Z., & Mokhlisi, M. (2005). Takht-e Foulad: A historical monument of Isfahan. Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization, Research Institute of Language and Dialects. https://www.gisoom.com/book/11085889 [In Persian].
Faizi, M., & Faizi, N. (2014). Archeological survey of Islamic cemeteries in Abdanan, Ilam. a scientific Journal of Ilam Culture, 14(40 41), 47-67. https://www.farhangeilam.ir/article_5078.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Ghazenfari, Z. (2013). A Comparative Study of Pictorial Motifs of Tombstones from the Last Century and Ancient Lorestan Bronzes [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Payame Noor University of Tehran. https://elmnet.ir/doc/10563557-2321 [In Persian].
Google Maps. (n.d.-a). [The distribution of Iranian mausoleums in terms of common motifs with the Imamzadeh Ibrahim cemetery]. Retrieved August 21, 2024, from https://www.google.com/maps/@33.3688681,44.6770489,1067168m
Google Maps. (n.d.-b). [Map of Gilan Province, Rudbar County and the Study Area]. Retrieved August 21, 2025, from https://www.google.com/maps/@37.188345,49.1006099,75662m
Hikmat, Z. (2010). A Comparative Study of Pictorial Elements of Tombstones in Takht-E Foulad Cemetery in Isfahan During the Safavid, Zand, Qajar, And Pahlavi Periods [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Art University, Faculty of Applied Arts. https://elmnet.ir/doc/10469403-15254 [In Persian].
Hosseini Khachak, S. M. (2013). A Study and Investigation of Tombstone Motifs in the Safid Chah Cemetery of Behshahr’s Galoogah [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Faculty of Literature and Humanities. https://www.virascience.com/thesis/610890/ [In Persian].
Kazemi, N. (2016). An Intertextual Study of Bakhtiari Tombstone Motifs [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Al-Zahra University, Faculty of Art. https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/viewer/cd1d8579040adae44ec2c60248aebc45?sample=1 [In Persian].
Kazempour, M. (2019). Study of Azerbaijan village carpet tools in the safavid period case study to ass gravestone in Kaleybar city. Goljaam, 15(35), 129-157
http://goljaam.icsa.ir/article-1-514-fa.html [In Persian].
Khodadadi, A. , Safikhani, N., & Ahmadpanah, S. A. (2018). A comparative study of the image of angel as a motif engraved on the tombstones of Armenians’ cemetery and those of Takht-e-Foolad cemetery in Esfahan. Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts, 23(3), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2018.227470.665609 [In Persian].
Ma'toufi, A. (2008). Tombstones and Historical Inscriptions of Gorgan and Astarabad (A look at Funerary Architecture and Burial Methods in Iran and Gorgan). Horoofieh. https://noorlib.ir/book/info/11855 [In Persian].
Makarem Shirazi, N. (1974). Tafsir-e Nemouneh [An exemplary interpretation]. Dar-ol-Kotob-e Eslamiyeh Publications. https://www.ghbook.ir/Nemoone [In Persian].
Maroufi Aghdam, E. (2017). A Study and Typology of Tombstones from the Islamic Period in the Eastern Mukrian Geographical Area [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Faculty of Geography. https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/d849a6c52fdc90db35009921f3b6b530 [In Persian].
Maroufi Aghdam, E., & Hajizadeh, K. (2020). Analysis, dating, and semiotics of cradle-type tombstones in Bukan. Journal of Art and Media Studies, (3), (Spring & Summer), 117–141. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2172140h [In Persian].
Maroufi Aghdam, E., Hajizadeh, K., Rezaloo, R., Afkhami, B., & tahmasbi, F. (2020-a). An evaluation of the design and patterns and study of the historical roots of the stone beams in the cemeteries of Islamic Iran. Negareh Journal, 15(56), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.22070/negareh.2020.3126 [In Persian].
Maroufi, E., Hajizadeh, K., Zarei, A., Mahmoodi Nasab, A. A., & Shahbazi Shiran, H. (2020-b). Cultural recognition and semiotics of tombstone patterns in Qajar cemeteries east mokrian geographical area. Negarineh Islamic Art, 7(19), 63-85. https://doi.org/10.22077/nia.2020.3581.1345 [In Persian].
Mehrabi Hafshejani, S. (2016). A study of the ritualistic motifs on tombstones of Hafshejan city in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province [Conference paper]. Research Conference on Science and Technology, Berlin, Germany, 1-20. https://sid.ir/paper/859962/fa [In Persian].
Nami, M. A. (1976). Travelogue of Astarabad, Mazandaran, and Guilan (M. Golzari, Ed.). Iran's Cultural Foundation. https://fa.wikinoor.ir/wiki/Nami [In Persian].
Nourallahi, A., & Alilou, S. (2016). Archaeological study of the tomb carvings of Armenians in the eastern central Zagros. Peyman Cultural Quarterly,  )76(, (Summer), 107-152. https://www.magiran.com/volume/115161 [In Persian].
Parizanganeh, V. (2011). A Comparative Study of the Pictorial Space of Cypress Motif on Tombstones of Takht-E Foulad Historical-Cultural Complex, Armenian Cemetery, Imamzadehs and Churches of Isfahan [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Art University, Faculty of Visual Arts. https://elmnet.ir/doc/10508983-22221 [In Persian].
Pooyan, J., & Khalili, M. (2010). Semiotics of tombstone motifs in Darolsalam Cemetery, Shiraz. Ketab-e Mahe Honar, (144), 98-107. https://www.magiran.com/paper/775686 [In Persian].
Rahmani, J., & Ghorbani, H. (2014). Cultural semiotics of tombstone motifs: With an emphasis on the cypress motif in Takht-e Foulad, Isfahan. Anthropological Studies, 1(1), 189–215. https://journal.richt.ir/article-4-268-fa.html [In Persian].
Rahmatizadeh, A., Soltanzadeh, H., Etesam, I., & Maktabad Amyat, S. M. (2019). The role of environment and culture in the formation of Islamic tombs in the southern margin of the Caspian Sea. Journal of Architectural Thought, 3(5), 60-83. https://doi.org/10.30479/at.2019.10608.1189  [In Persian].
Razmara, A. (1951). Farhang-e Joghrafiya-ye Iran (Abadiha) [Geographical dictionary of Iran (Villages)]. Daayere-ye Joghrafiya-ye Setad-e Artesh. https://fa.wikisource.org/wiki/Razm [In Persian].
Rezayati Kishekhalel, M.,  &Asgharzadeh, M. (2016). Comparing roudbari Kormanji dialect with Kormanji dialects of Khorasan. Journal of Linguistics and Khorasan Dialects, 8(14), 51-76. https://doi.org/10.22067/lj.v8i14.54976 [In Persian].
Rrahmani, R., Sharifzadeh, S. A., & Amraei, M. (2022). Symbology and typology of stone lions with emphasis on patterns and outlines. Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts, 27(1), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2021.320212.666665 [In Persian].
Sadraie A,  & Maroufi Aghdam, E. (2021). A Study on the reflection of war tools in tombstones of the Islamic Era of Iran.  Athar. 42(3), 424-446. 
http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-901-en.html [In Persian].
Safikhani, N. , Ahmadpanah, S. A., & Khodadad, A. (2014). Semiotic of Isfahan s Takht-e Foulad cemetery motifs (with emphasis on animal motifs of lion and fish). Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts, 19(4), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2014.55422 [In Persian].
Sanaei, S. K. (2002). Statistical yearbook of Gilan province. Guilan Province Management and Planning Organization. [In Persian].
Sattarnezhad, S., RahChamani, A. A., & Parvin, S. (2021). Typology, classification and analysis patterns of the tombstones from Ilkhanid to Qajar era in Iran. Journal of Islamic Archaeology studies, 1(2), 119-137. https://islamicarc.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_3221.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Sattarnezhad, S., Narimani, M., & Azizi, S. (2021). Typology, classification and analysis of headstones of Irans’ North West in Islamic era (case study: from the Ilkhanid to the end of the Safavid era). Negareh Journal, 16(59), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.22070/negareh.2020.4881.2338 [In Persian].
Shamim, A. (2008). Iran during the Qajar dynasty. Behzad. https://noorlib.ir/book/info/11867 [In Persian].
Sharifi, A., & Nemati, P. (2013). Tombstones of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province. Behta Pazhouhesh. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1978509  [In Persian].
Sharifinia, A., shakarami, T., & Arjomandi, R. (2020). Review and analytics on Darreh Shahr gravestone decorations. Negarineh Islamic Art, 6(18), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.22077/nia.2020.2549.1223  [In Persian].
Sharifinia, A., & Lashkari, A. (2018). A review and study of eecorative motifs of tombstones in Madar Zoleykhah Cemetery in Darreh Shahr. Glory of Art (Jelve-y Honar) Alzahra Scientific Quarterly Journal, 10(1), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.22051/jjh.2017.9247.1081  [In Persian].
Taher Abadi, M., & Jahed, M. (2021). Introduction and semiology of the engraved tombstones motifs of the Islamic era in the cemetery of Fash village in Kangavar city. Journal of Islamic Archaeology studies, 1(2), 61-75. https://islamicarc.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_3218.html [In Persian].
Tanavoli, P. (2009). Tombstone. Bongah. https://yassavoli.com/product/4735811 [In Persian].
Tehrani, A. (1977). Diyarbakriyyah. Offset Press. https://asmaneketab.ir/product/1356 [In Persian].
Warner, R. (2007). Encyclopedia of World Mythology (A. Esmailpour, Trans.). Nashr-e Ostureh. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1457913 [In Persian].
Zahed, S. (2015). A Comparative Study of Stone Carvings on the Tombstones of Safid Chah qnd Khalid Nabi Cemeteries [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Al-Zahra University, Faculty of Art. https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir//#/articles/3dda874df3ad76888a1c258dd541b9f7 [In Persian].
Zamani, N. (2009). A New Look at the Preservation of Stone Lions in the Historical Cemeteries of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Isfahan University of Art, Faculty of Restoration. http://dlibrary.aui.ac.ir/parvan/resource/157 [In Persian].
فصلنامه نگره
دوره 20، شماره 75
پاییز 1404
صفحه 266-295

  • تاریخ دریافت 10 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 13 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 14 اسفند 1403